NIH Section on Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology, jointly supported by the Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), Bethesda, MD, USA.
NIH Section on Chemistry and Drug Metabolism, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch and Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;23(1):115-122. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.27. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
Oxytocin (OT) is a potential treatment for multiple neuropsychiatric disorders. As OT is a peptide, delivery by the intranasal (IN) route is the preferred method in clinical studies. Although studies have shown increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) OT levels following IN administration, this does not unequivocably demonstrate that the peripherally administered OT is entering the CSF. For example, it has been suggested that peripheral delivery of OT could lead to central release of endogenous OT. It is also unknown whether the IN route provides for more efficient entry of the peptide into the CSF compared to the intravenous (IV) route, which requires blood-brain barrier penetration. To address these questions, we developed a sensitive and specific quantitative mass spectrometry assay that distinguishes labeled (d5-deuterated) from endogenous (d0) OT. We administered d5 OT (80 IU) to six nonhuman primates via IN and IV routes as well as IN saline as a control condition. We measured plasma and CSF concentrations of administered and endogenous OT before (t=0) and after (t=10, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min) d5 OT dosing. We demonstrate CSF penetrance of d5, exogenous OT delivered by IN and IV administration. Peripheral administration of d5 OT did not lead to increased d0, endogenous OT in the CSF. This suggests that peripheral administration of OT does not lead to central release of endogenous OT. We also did not find that IN administration offered an advantage compared to IV administration with respect to achieving greater CSF concentrations of OT.
催产素(OT)是治疗多种神经精神疾病的潜在药物。由于 OT 是一种肽,因此在临床研究中,经鼻(IN)给药是首选方法。尽管研究表明 IN 给药后脑脊液(CSF)中的 OT 水平增加,但这并不能明确证明外周给予的 OT 进入了 CSF。例如,有人认为 OT 的外周给药可能导致内源性 OT 的中枢释放。此外,尚不清楚与需要穿透血脑屏障的静脉内(IV)途径相比,IN 途径是否能更有效地将肽递送入 CSF。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种灵敏且特异的定量质谱测定法,可区分标记的(d5-氘代)和内源性(d0)OT。我们通过 IN 和 IV 途径以及 IN 盐水(作为对照条件)向 6 只非人类灵长类动物给予 d5 OT(80IU)。我们在给予 d5 OT 之前(t=0)和之后(t=10、20、30、45 和 60min)测量了给药和内源性 OT 的血浆和 CSF 浓度。我们证明了 IN 和 IV 给药的外源性 d5 OT 可穿透 CSF。外周给予 d5 OT 不会导致 CSF 中内源性 d0 OT 增加。这表明 OT 的外周给药不会导致内源性 OT 的中枢释放。我们也没有发现与 IV 给药相比,IN 给药在实现更高的 OT 脑脊液浓度方面具有优势。