League-Pascual James C, Lester-McCully Cynthia M, Shandilya Shaefali, Ronner Lukas, Rodgers Louis, Cruz Rafael, Peer Cody J, Figg William D, Warren Katherine E
Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA, USA.
Pediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2017 May;132(3):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2388-x. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits entry of most chemotherapeutic agents into the CNS, resulting in inadequate exposure within CNS tumor tissue. Intranasal administration is a proposed means of delivery that can bypass the BBB, potentially resulting in more effective chemotherapeutic exposure at the tumor site. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics (plasma and CSF) of intranasal delivery using select chemotherapeutic agents in a non-human primate (NHP) model. Three chemotherapeutic agents with known differences in CNS penetration were selected for intranasal administration in a NHP model to determine proof of principle of CNS delivery, assess tolerability and feasibility, and to evaluate whether certain drug characteristics were associated with increased CNS exposure. Intravenous (IV) temozolomide (TMZ), oral (PO) valproic acid, and PO perifosine were administered to adult male rhesus macaques. The animals received a single dose of each agent systemically and intranasally in separate experiments, with each animal acting as his own control. The dose of the agents administered systemically was the human equivalent of a clinically appropriate dose, while the intranasal dose was the maximum achievable dose based on the volume limitation of 1 mL. Multiple serial paired plasma and CSF samples were collected and quantified using a validated uHPLC/tandem mass spectrometry assay after each drug administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis. CSF penetration was calculated from the ratio of areas under the concentration-time curves for CSF and plasma (AUC). Intranasal administration was feasible and tolerable for all agents with no significant toxicities observed. For TMZ, the degrees of CSF drug penetration after intranasal and IV administration were 36 (32-57) and 22 (20-41)%, respectively. Although maximum TMZ drug concentration in the CSF (C) was lower after intranasal delivery compared to IV administration due to the lower dose administered, clinically significant exposure was achieved in the CSF after intranasal administration with the lower doses. This was associated with lower systemic exposure, suggesting increased efficiency and potentially lower toxicities of TMZ after intranasal delivery. For valproic acid and perifosine, CSF penetration after intranasal delivery was similar to systemic administration. Although this study demonstrates feasibility and safety of intranasal drug administration, further agent-specific studies are necessary to optimize agent selection and dosing to achieve clinically-relevant CSF exposures.
血脑屏障(BBB)限制了大多数化疗药物进入中枢神经系统(CNS),导致中枢神经系统肿瘤组织内的药物暴露不足。鼻内给药是一种建议的给药方式,它可以绕过血脑屏障,有可能在肿瘤部位实现更有效的化疗药物暴露。本研究的目的是在非人类灵长类动物(NHP)模型中评估使用特定化疗药物进行鼻内给药的可行性和药代动力学(血浆和脑脊液)。选择三种已知中枢神经系统穿透性不同的化疗药物在NHP模型中进行鼻内给药,以确定中枢神经系统给药的原理证明,评估耐受性和可行性,并评估某些药物特性是否与增加的中枢神经系统暴露相关。对成年雄性恒河猴静脉注射(IV)替莫唑胺(TMZ)、口服(PO)丙戊酸和口服哌立福新。在单独的实验中,动物分别接受每种药物的单次全身给药和鼻内给药,每只动物作为自身对照。全身给药的药物剂量相当于临床适当剂量的人类等效剂量,而鼻内给药剂量是基于1 mL体积限制的最大可实现剂量。每次给药后,收集多个连续配对的血浆和脑脊液样本,并使用经过验证的超高效液相色谱/串联质谱分析法进行定量。使用非房室分析估计药代动力学参数。脑脊液穿透率根据脑脊液和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积之比(AUC)计算。所有药物的鼻内给药都是可行的且耐受性良好,未观察到明显毒性。对于TMZ,鼻内给药和静脉注射后脑脊液药物穿透率分别为36(32 - 57)%和22(20 - 41)%。尽管由于给药剂量较低,鼻内给药后脑脊液中TMZ的最大药物浓度(C)低于静脉注射,但鼻内给药较低剂量后在脑脊液中实现了具有临床意义的暴露。这与较低的全身暴露相关,表明鼻内给药后TMZ的效率提高且潜在毒性降低。对于丙戊酸和哌立福新,鼻内给药后的脑脊液穿透率与全身给药相似。尽管本研究证明了鼻内给药的可行性和安全性,但仍需要进一步进行特定药物的研究,以优化药物选择和给药剂量,从而实现与临床相关的脑脊液暴露。