Tate David F, Gusman Maria, Kini Jonathan, Reid Matthew, Velez Carmen S, Drennon Ann Marie, Cooper Douglas B, Kennedy Jan E, Bowles Amy O, Bigler Erin D, Lewis Jeffrey D, Ritter John, York Gerald E
Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri-St Louis, 4633 World Parkway Circle, Berkeley, MO 63134.
Department of Radiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234.
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1651-e1658. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00132.
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a major health concern among active duty service members and Veterans returning from combat operations, and it can result in variable clinical and cognitive outcomes. Identifying biomarkers that can improve diagnosis and prognostication has been at the forefront of recent research efforts. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of abnormalities identified using more traditional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences such as fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) to more advanced MRI sequences such as susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) among a cohort of active duty service members experiencing persistent cognitive symptoms after mTBI. One-hundred and fifty-two active duty service members (77 mTBI, 58 orthopedically injured [OI] only, 17 post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] only) underwent MRI and neuropsychological evaluation at a large military treatment facility. Results demonstrated that FLAIR white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) were present in all three groups at statistically similar rates (41% mTBI, 49% OI, and 29% PTSD). With the exception of a single OI participant showing a small discrete SWI lesion, SWI abnormalities were overwhelmingly present in mTBI patients (22% mTBI, 1% OI, and 0% PTSD). Functionally, mTBI participants with and without SWI abnormalities did not differ in demographics, symptom reporting, or cognitive performance. However, mTBI participants with and without WMH did differ for on measures of working memory with the mTBI participants with WMH having worse cognitive performance. No other significant differences were noted for those participants with and without imaging abnormalities for either the OI or PTSD only cohorts. These results appear to illustrate the sensitivity and specificity of SWI findings though these results did not have any significant functional impact in this cohort. In contrast, WMHs noted on FLAIR imaging were not sensitive or specific findings, but functionally relevant among mTBI participants. These findings emphasize the complexity of injury and functional outcome in mTBI patients that requires additional examination.
轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)是现役军人和从战斗行动中返回的退伍军人中主要的健康问题,它可能导致各种临床和认知结果。识别能够改善诊断和预后的生物标志物一直是近期研究工作的重点。本研究的目的是比较在一组mTBI后出现持续认知症状的现役军人中,使用更传统的磁共振成像(MRI)序列(如液体衰减反转恢复序列[FLAIR])与更先进的MRI序列(如磁敏感加权成像[SWI])所识别出的异常的敏感性和特异性。152名现役军人(77名mTBI患者、58名仅骨科受伤[OI]患者、17名仅患有创伤后应激障碍[PTSD]患者)在一家大型军事治疗机构接受了MRI和神经心理学评估。结果表明,FLAIR序列的白质高信号(WMH)在三组中的出现率在统计学上相似(mTBI组为41%,OI组为49%,PTSD组为29%)。除了一名OI参与者显示出一个小的离散SWI病变外,SWI异常绝大多数出现在mTBI患者中(mTBI组为22%,OI组为1%,PTSD组为0%)。在功能方面,有和没有SWI异常的mTBI参与者在人口统计学、症状报告或认知表现上没有差异。然而,有和没有WMH的mTBI参与者在工作记忆测量方面存在差异,有WMH的mTBI参与者认知表现更差。对于仅患有OI或PTSD的队列中,有和没有影像学异常的参与者,未发现其他显著差异。这些结果似乎说明了SWI检查结果的敏感性和特异性,尽管这些结果在该队列中没有任何显著的功能影响。相比之下,FLAIR成像上发现的WMH不是敏感或特异的表现,但在mTBI参与者中具有功能相关性。这些发现强调了mTBI患者损伤和功能结果的复杂性,需要进一步检查。