Mutti Donald O, Mitchell G Lynn, Jones-Jordan Lisa A, Cotter Susan A, Kleinstein Robert N, Manny Ruth E, Twelker J Daniel, Zadnik Karla
The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, California, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Mar 1;58(3):1594-1602. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19093.
To investigate the ratio of accommodative convergence per diopter of accommodative response (AC/A ratio) before, during, and after myopia onset.
Subjects were 698 children aged 6 to 14 years who became myopic and 430 emmetropic children participating in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error. Refractive error was measured using cycloplegic autorefraction, near work by parent survey, and the AC/A ratio by simultaneously monitoring convergence and accommodative response. The response AC/A ratios of children who became myopic were compared with age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched model estimates for emmetropic children from 5 years before through 5 years after the onset of myopia.
The response AC/A ratio was not significantly different between the two groups 5 years before onset, then increased monotonically in children who became myopic until reaching a plateau at myopia onset of about 7 Δ/D compared to about 4 Δ/D for children who remained emmetropic (differences between groups significant at P < 0.01 from 4 years before onset through 5 years after onset). A higher AC/A ratio was associated with greater accommodative lag but not with the rate of myopia progression regardless of the level of near work.
An increasing AC/A ratio is an early sign of becoming myopic, is related to greater accommodative lag, but does not affect the rate of myopia progression. The association with accommodative lag suggests that the AC/A ratio increase is from greater neural effort needed per diopter of accommodation rather than change in the accommodative convergence crosslink gain relationship.
研究近视发生前、发生期间及发生后的调节性集合与调节反应之比(AC/A 比率)。
研究对象为 698 名 6 至 14 岁近视儿童以及 430 名正视儿童,这些正视儿童参与了种族与屈光不正协作纵向评估研究。使用睫状肌麻痹验光测量屈光不正,通过家长调查问卷评估近距工作情况,并通过同时监测集合和调节反应来测量 AC/A 比率。将近视儿童的反应性 AC/A 比率与近视发生前 5 年至发生后 5 年年龄、性别和种族匹配的正视儿童模型估计值进行比较。
在近视发生前 5 年,两组的反应性 AC/A 比率无显著差异,之后近视儿童的该比率单调增加,直至在近视发生时达到平稳状态,约为 7Δ/D,而正视儿童约为 4Δ/D(从近视发生前 4 年至发生后 5 年,两组间差异在 P < 0.01 水平具有统计学意义)。较高的 AC/A 比率与更大的调节滞后相关,但与近视进展速率无关,无论近距工作水平如何。
AC/A 比率增加是近视发生的早期迹象,与更大的调节滞后有关,但不影响近视进展速率。与调节滞后的关联表明,AC/A 比率增加是由于每单位调节所需的神经努力增加,而非调节性集合交联增益关系的改变。