Miyata Manabu, Hasebe Satoshi, Ohtsuki Hiroshi
Department of Ophthalmology, Okayama University, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep-Oct;50(5):438-442. doi: 10.1007/s10384-006-0353-x.
To determine the influence of the lag of accommodation (LOA) on the accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A) ratio measured by the far-gradient method in strabismic patients.
The AC/A ratio was measured with a distance target viewed with and without -3.00 diopter (D) addition lenses in 63 patients with different types of strabismus (age range, 7-34 years; range of strabismic angle, -60 to +40 prism diopters; refractive error range, -7.33 to +6.63 D). The LOA for the same lens was measured with an open-view-type autorefractometer. The stimulus AC/A ratio and the AC/A ratio adjusted by the individually measured LOA (adjusted AC/A ratio) were compared.
The mean +/- SD of the LOA to the -3.00 D lenses was 1.06 +/- 0.43 D. The mean adjusted AC/A ratio was 41% greater than the stimulus AC/A ratio. The LOA differed widely among patients (0.13 to 2.14 D), and a large LOA tended to appear in myopic or young patients.
The AC/A ratio obtained using the conventional far-gradient method is significantly biased by the LOA, and thus does not always represent the actual relationship between accommodation and vergence control systems.
确定调节滞后(LOA)对斜视患者采用远距离梯度法测量的调节性集合与调节(AC/A)比值的影响。
对63例不同类型斜视患者(年龄范围7至34岁;斜视角度范围-60至+40棱镜度;屈光不正范围-7.33至+6.63 D),在使用和不使用-3.00屈光度(D)附加透镜的情况下测量其观看远距离目标时的AC/A比值。使用开放式自动验光仪测量同一透镜的LOA。比较刺激AC/A比值和根据个体测量的LOA调整后的AC/A比值(调整后的AC/A比值)。
-3.00 D透镜的LOA平均值±标准差为1.06±0.43 D。调整后的AC/A比值平均值比刺激AC/A比值大41%。患者之间的LOA差异很大(0.13至2.14 D),高度近视或年轻患者往往出现较大的LOA。
使用传统远距离梯度法获得的AC/A比值受LOA的显著影响,因此并不总是代表调节和聚散控制系统之间的实际关系。