Garratt A M, Stavem K
Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Mar 14;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0625-9.
The interpretation of the SF-36 in Norwegian populations largely uses normative data from 1996. This study presents data for the general population from 2002-2003 which has been used for comparative purposes but has not been assessed for measurement properties.
As part of the Norwegian Level of Living Survey 2002-2003, a postal survey was conducted comprising 9,164 members of the general population aged 16 years and over representative for Norway who received the Norwegian SF-36 version 1.2. The SF-36 was assessed against widely applied criteria including data completeness and assumptions relating to the construction and scoring of multi-item scales. Normative data are given for the eight SF-36 scales and the two summary scales (PCS, MCS) for eight age groups and gender.
There were 5,396 (58.9%) respondents. Item levels of missing data ranged from 0.6 to 3.0% with scale scores computable for 97.5 to 99.8% of respondents. All item-total correlations were above 0.4 and were of a similar level with the exceptions of the easiest and most difficult physical function items and two general health items. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.8 for all scales. Under 5% of respondents scored at the floor for five scales. Role-physical had the highest floor effect (14.6%) and together with role-emotional had the highest ceiling effects (66.3-76.8%). With three exceptions for the eight age groups, females had lower scores than males across the eight health scales. The two youngest age groups (<30 years) had the highest scores for physical aspects of health; physical function, role-physical, bodily pain and general health. The age groups 40-49 and 60-69 years had the highest scores for role-emotional and mental health respectively.
This SF-36 data meet necessary criteria for applications of normative data. The data is more recent, has more respondents including older people than the original Norwegian normative data from 1996, and can help the interpretation of SF-36 scores in applications that include clinical and health services research.
挪威人群中对SF-36量表的解读大多采用1996年的标准数据。本研究呈现了2002 - 2003年普通人群的数据,这些数据已用于比较目的,但尚未对其测量特性进行评估。
作为2002 - 2003年挪威生活水平调查的一部分,开展了一项邮寄调查,调查对象为9164名16岁及以上的挪威普通人群成员,他们收到了挪威版SF-36量表1.2。根据广泛应用的标准对SF-36量表进行评估,包括数据完整性以及与多项目量表构建和评分相关的假设。给出了八个年龄组和性别的八个SF-36量表以及两个汇总量表(PCS、MCS)的标准数据。
有5396名(58.9%)受访者。缺失数据的项目水平在0.6%至3.0%之间,97.5%至99.8%的受访者可计算量表得分。所有项目与总分的相关性均高于0.4,除了最简单和最困难的身体功能项目以及两个总体健康项目外,其他项目的相关性水平相似。所有量表的克朗巴哈系数均超过0.8。不到5%的受访者在五个量表上得分处于最低水平。角色 - 身体功能量表的地板效应最高(14.6%),角色 - 身体功能量表和角色 - 情感量表的天花板效应最高(66.3% - 76.8%)。在八个年龄组中有三个例外,在八个健康量表中,女性得分低于男性。两个最年轻的年龄组(<30岁)在健康的身体方面得分最高;身体功能、角色 - 身体功能、身体疼痛和总体健康。40 - 49岁和60 - 69岁年龄组分别在角色 - 情感和心理健康方面得分最高。
这些SF-36数据符合标准数据应用的必要标准。与1996年挪威原始标准数据相比,这些数据更新,受访者更多,包括老年人,并且有助于在临床和卫生服务研究等应用中解读SF-36得分。