• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病风险评估工具在老年护理机构居民中的有效性有限。

Limited Effectiveness of Diabetes Risk Assessment Tools in Seniors' Facility Residents.

作者信息

Featherstone Travis, Eurich Dean T, Simpson Scot H

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2403. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2403
PMID:28292477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Undiagnosed diabetes can create significant management issues for seniors.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of two diabetes risk surveys-the Canadian Diabetes Risk Assessment Questionnaire (CANRISK) and the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC)-to identify elevated blood glucose levels in seniors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in senior living facilities in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Those with known diabetes, without capacity, considered frail, or unable to communicate in English were excluded. Participants completed the CANRISK and FINDRISC surveys and had their glycated hemoglobin A (HbA) measured. Correlations between seniors with elevated risk on the surveys and an HbA value of 6.5% or higher or 6.0% and higher were assessed.

RESULTS

In this study, 290 residents participated; their mean age was 84.3 ± 7.3 years, 82 (28%) were men, and their mean HbA level was 5.7% ± 0.4%. Mean CANRISK score was 29.4 ± 8.0, and of the 254 (88%) considered to be moderate or high risk, 10 (4%) had an HbA level of 6.5% or higher and 49 (19%) had an HbA level of 6.0% or higher. Mean FINDRISC score was 10.8 ± 4.2, and of the 58 (20%) considered to be high or very high risk, 4 (7%) had an HbA level of 6.5% or higher and 15 (26%) had an HbA level of 6.0% or higher. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.42-0.72) for the CANRISK survey identifying participants with an HbA level of 6.5% or higher and 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.67) for identifying participants with an HbA level of 6.0% or higher. Similar characteristics were observed for the FINDRISC survey.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of seniors with no known diabetes history, mean HbA level approximated that in the general population and neither survey effectively identified those with elevated blood glucose levels. These findings should be confirmed in a larger study; nevertheless, routine use of these surveys as a diabetes screening strategy does not appear to be warranted at this time.

摘要

背景

未确诊的糖尿病会给老年人带来重大的管理问题。

目的

评估两种糖尿病风险调查——加拿大糖尿病风险评估问卷(CANRISK)和芬兰糖尿病风险评分(FINDRISC)——在识别老年人血糖水平升高方面的有效性。

方法

在加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿的老年生活设施中进行了一项横断面研究。排除已知患有糖尿病、无行为能力、被认为身体虚弱或无法用英语交流的人。参与者完成了CANRISK和FINDRISC调查,并测量了糖化血红蛋白A(HbA)。评估了调查中风险升高的老年人与HbA值≥6.5%或≥6.0%之间的相关性。

结果

本研究中,290名居民参与;他们的平均年龄为84.3±7.3岁,82名(28%)为男性,平均HbA水平为5.7%±0.4%。CANRISK平均得分为29.4±8.0,在被认为中度或高风险的254名(88%)参与者中,10名(4%)的HbA水平≥6.5%,49名(19%)的HbA水平≥6.0%。FINDRISC平均得分为10.8±4.2,在被认为高风险或非常高风险的58名(20%)参与者中,4名(7%)的HbA水平≥6.5%,15名(26%)的HbA水平≥6.0%。CANRISK调查识别HbA水平≥6.5%参与者的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.57(95%置信区间0.42 - 0.72),识别HbA水平≥6.0%参与者的为0.59(95%置信区间0.51 - 0.67)。FINDRISC调查也观察到类似特征。

结论

在这组无已知糖尿病病史的老年人中,平均HbA水平接近一般人群,两种调查均未有效识别出血糖水平升高的人群。这些发现应在更大规模的研究中得到证实;然而,目前似乎没有必要将这些调查作为糖尿病筛查策略常规使用。

相似文献

1
Limited Effectiveness of Diabetes Risk Assessment Tools in Seniors' Facility Residents.糖尿病风险评估工具在老年护理机构居民中的有效性有限。
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2403. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Value of risk stratification to increase the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population.风险分层在美国人群未诊断糖尿病筛查中提高糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)预测效度的价值。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1346-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0661-6. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
3
Cutoff value of HbA1c for predicting diabetes and prediabetes in a Chinese high risk population aged over 45.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)在中国45岁以上高危人群中预测糖尿病及糖尿病前期的临界值
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2015;24(3):360-6. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.2015.24.3.14.
4
A novel testing model for opportunistic screening of pre-diabetes and diabetes among U.S. adults.一种针对美国成年人进行糖尿病前期和糖尿病机会性筛查的新型检测模型。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0120382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120382. eCollection 2015.
5
Postoperative dysglycemia in elective non-diabetic surgical patients: a prospective observational study.择期非糖尿病手术患者术后血糖异常:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Dec;63(12):1319-1334. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0742-7. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Shifting from glucose diagnosis to the new HbA1c diagnosis reduces the capability of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) to screen for glucose abnormalities within a real-life primary healthcare preventive strategy.从葡萄糖诊断转变为新的 HbA1c 诊断会降低芬兰糖尿病风险评分 (FINDRISC) 在现实生活中的初级保健预防策略中筛查葡萄糖异常的能力。
BMC Med. 2013 Feb 21;11:45. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-45.
7
Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白 A1c 联合用于糖尿病和糖调节受损的筛查。
Acta Diabetol. 2010 Sep;47(3):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00592-009-0143-2. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
8
Erythrocytosis and Performance of HbA1c in Detecting Diabetes on an Oxygen-Deficient Plateau: A Population-based Study.低氧环境下红细胞增多对糖化血红蛋白检测糖尿病的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Apr 1;105(4). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa001.
9
External validation of three diabetes prediction scores in a Spanish cohort: does adding high risk for depression improve the validation of the FINDRISC score (FINDRISC-MOOD)?三种糖尿病预测评分在西班牙队列中的外部验证:在 FINDRISC 评分(FINDRISC-MOOD)中增加抑郁高风险是否能提高验证效果?
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 6;14(6):e083121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083121.
10
Performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and a Simplified Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in a Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Programme for Screening of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dysglycaemia in Madrid, Spain: The SPREDIA-2 Study.芬兰糖尿病风险评分和简化芬兰糖尿病风险评分在西班牙马德里一项基于社区的横断面项目中用于筛查未诊断的2型糖尿病和血糖异常的表现:SPREDIA-2研究
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0158489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158489. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy of New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score in Screening Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern China.新型中国糖尿病风险评分在中国东部社区人群中筛查未诊断 2 型糖尿病和糖尿病前期的效果:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Apr 29;2020:7463082. doi: 10.1155/2020/7463082. eCollection 2020.