Suppr超能文献

糖浆与天花:卫生技术评估中多标准决策分析模型的两项测试

Treacle and Smallpox: Two Tests for Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models in Health Technology Assessment.

作者信息

Morton Alec

机构信息

Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde Business School, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):512-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

Abstract

Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is rightly receiving increasing attention in health technology assessment. Nevertheless, a distinguishing feature of the health domain is that technologies must actually improve health, and good performance on other criteria cannot compensate for failure to do so. We argue for two reasonable tests for MCDA models: the treacle test (can a winning intervention be incompletely ineffective?) and the smallpox test (can a winning intervention be for a disease that no one suffers from?). We explore why models might fail such tests (as the models of some existing published studies would do) and offer some suggestions as to how practice should be improved.

摘要

多标准决策分析(MCDA)在卫生技术评估中受到越来越多的关注,这是合理的。然而,卫生领域的一个显著特点是,技术必须真正改善健康状况,在其他标准上表现良好并不能弥补未能做到这一点的缺陷。我们主张对MCDA模型进行两项合理的检验:糖蜜检验(获胜的干预措施会完全无效吗?)和天花检验(获胜的干预措施是针对一种无人患有的疾病吗?)。我们探讨了模型可能无法通过此类检验的原因(正如一些已发表的现有研究模型那样),并就如何改进实践提出了一些建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验