Sharaf Fawzy, Alnohair Sultan
Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-4.
To compare the students' perception of team-based learning (TBL): The paper (hard copy) compared with the e-copy (electronic copy) in the family medicine course of the fifth year medical students, Qassim University College of Medicine.
A cross-sectional study was conducted during the family medicine course in 2015-2016 to compare the hard copy and the e-copy TBL sessions. We used Google drive to distribute, collect and analyze the questionnaire. The results of the e-copy TBL are shown and displayed directly with each session to the students, which was not the same as practiced with hard copy. We used also SPSS (version 17 for Windows) for more statistical analysis.
The total number of respondents of students in each was 96; a phase of TBL phase 1 (hard copy) and phase 2 (e-copy). Male were 64 (66.7%) and females 32 (33.3%). The first three knowledge questions showed no difference between the mean score between paper and e-copy TBL, but of the perception questions showed a significant difference between the paper and e-copy TBL.
The results of the survey showed that the students prefer e-copy TBL as a course format, as it was an attraction for most of the students and making them even more successful in the key exam and e-copy TBL develop the skills needed to work productively in task-groups.
比较学生对基于团队学习（TBL）的看法：在卡西姆大学医学院五年级医学生的家庭医学课程中，将纸质版（硬拷贝）与电子版（电子拷贝）进行比较。
在2015 - 2016年家庭医学课程期间进行了一项横断面研究，以比较纸质版和电子版TBL课程。我们使用谷歌驱动器来分发、收集和分析问卷。电子版TBL的结果会在每次课程时直接向学生展示和呈现，这与纸质版的做法不同。我们还使用SPSS（Windows版17）进行更多的统计分析。
每个阶段（TBL阶段1为纸质版，阶段2为电子版）的学生受访者总数均为96人。男性64人（66.7%），女性32人（33.3%）。前三个知识问题显示纸质版和电子版TBL的平均得分之间没有差异，但感知问题显示纸质版和电子版TBL之间存在显著差异。
调查结果表明，学生更喜欢电子版TBL作为课程形式，因为它对大多数学生具有吸引力，使他们在关键考试中更成功，并且电子版TBL培养了在任务小组中高效工作所需的技能。
