Suppr超能文献

基于团队学习的学生评估工具(TBL-SAI),用于评估沙特医学生对 TBL 的接受程度。心理测量学分析及其与学年的差异。

Team-based learning student assessment instrument (TBL-SAI) for assessing students acceptance of TBL in a Saudi medical school. Psychometric analysis and differences by academic year.

机构信息

Department of Basic Medical Science (Microbiology Unit), College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2020 May;41(5):542-547. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.5.25054.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess psychometric properties of team-based learning student assessment instrument (TBL-SAI) and TBL acceptance by student academic year.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia, between February and May 2018. Students (n=109) from second- to fourth-year were scored on TBL-SAI scale (33-items). Principal axis factoring with varimax rotation was conducted on the scale to identify the emerged factors. Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlation were used to check the reliability and validity of the instrument.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.798. The means scores of TBL-SAI scale and each subscale was favorable. On factoring analysis, 27-items of revised TBL-SAI scale were retained and 7 factors emerged. Factor 1 stands for TBL satisfaction; factors 2, 4, 5, 6 stand for TBL versus lecture preference, factors 3 and 7 stand for TBL accountability.  The scale was positively correlated with each TBL favor subscale, ranged between 0.328 and 0.756. Year-4 students scored higher (p less than 0.001) on TBL-SAI compared to year-2 or year-3 students.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised TBL-SAI is valid and reliable tool to measure the favor of TBL. Longitudinal studies across all academic levels are recommended to provide a clearer picture of the students' acceptance rate of TBL.

摘要

目的

评估团队学习学生评估工具(TBL-SAI)的心理测量学特性和学生年级对 TBL 的接受程度。

方法

本横断面研究于 2018 年 2 月至 5 月在沙特阿拉伯比沙的比沙大学医学院进行。对二至四年级的学生(n=109)进行 TBL-SAI 量表(33 项)评分。对量表进行主轴因子分析和方差极大旋转,以确定出现的因素。使用克朗巴赫α系数和项目总分相关性来检查仪器的可靠性和有效性。

结果

总量表的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.798。TBL-SAI 量表和每个子量表的平均得分均较好。在因子分析中,保留了修订后的 TBL-SAI 量表的 27 项,出现了 7 个因素。因素 1 代表 TBL 满意度;因素 2、4、5、6 代表 TBL 与讲座偏好,因素 3 和 7 代表 TBL 责任制。该量表与每个 TBL 支持子量表呈正相关,相关系数在 0.328 至 0.756 之间。与二或三年级学生相比,四年级学生的 TBL-SAI 得分更高(p 小于 0.001)。

结论

修订后的 TBL-SAI 是一种有效的、可靠的工具,可用于衡量 TBL 的偏好。建议在所有学术水平上进行纵向研究,以更清楚地了解学生对 TBL 的接受率。

相似文献

3
Team-Based Learning Activities for First-Year Medical Students: Perception of the Learners.
South Med J. 2018 Sep;111(9):525-529. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000865.
8
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
9
The Facilitator Instrument for Team-Based Learning (FIT).
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):82-90. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1646653. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
10
Understanding the early effects of team-based learning on student accountability and engagement using a three session TBL pilot.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):802-807. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

5
Comparison of student confidence and perceptions of biochemistry concepts using a team-based learning versus traditional lecture-based format.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Mar-Apr;9(2):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):51. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79451.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验