• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用TEDIL测试评估土耳其语人工耳蜗植入儿童的早期语言发展。

Assessment of early language development in Turkish children with a cochlear implant using the TEDIL test.

作者信息

Koşaner Julie, Deniz Hüseyin, Uruk Deniz, Deniz Murat, Kara Eyup, Amann Edda

机构信息

a MEDers Turkey , Meşrutiyet Caddesi Hatay Sok No: 24/4 Kocatepe/Kızılay, 06640 Ankara , Turkey.

b MED-EL Innsbruck , Fürstenweg 77a, 6020 Innsbruck , Austria.

出版信息

Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 May;18(3):153-161. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1299392. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1080/14670100.2017.1299392
PMID:28293989
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse language development of children with a cochlear implant (CI) in relation to length of CI use and age at implantation and to examine the suitability of the TEDIL as an assessment tool for measuring early language development in Turkish children.

METHODS

A total of 119 children implanted with a CI before 5 years of age were assessed acutely on sound field thresholds, speech recognition thresholds, open-set and closed-set monosyllabic word tests, the TEDIL, categories of auditory performance (CAP), and speech intelligibility rating (SIR). The outcome scores were analysed in relation to length of CI use (3, 4, and 5 years) and age at implantation (<24 months vs. >24 months). The TEDIL scores were compared to all other outcome measures.

RESULTS

Scores significantly increased with CI experience. CAP and SIR were significantly higher in the younger implanted group. No significant difference was observed between the younger and older implanted group on the closed-set and open-set monosyllabic tests and the TEDIL. The TEDIL scores significantly correlated with CAP, SIR, and the closed-set and open-set word scores. The mean TEDIL standard score was close to average.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of CI users improves with increased CI experience. CI users implanted <24 months tend to have better auditory skills and clearer speech than CI users implanted >24 months. CI users implanted between 24 months and 60 months tend to develop language similarly to CI users implanted <24 months. The TEDIL is a suitable tool for assessing early receptive and expressive language development in Turkish children.

摘要

目的

分析人工耳蜗植入(CI)儿童的语言发展与CI使用时长及植入时年龄的关系,并检验土耳其语早期语言发展测试(TEDIL)作为评估土耳其儿童早期语言发展的工具的适用性。

方法

对119名5岁前接受CI植入的儿童进行了声场阈值、言语识别阈值、开放式和封闭式单音节词测试、TEDIL、听觉表现类别(CAP)及言语可懂度评分(SIR)的急性评估。分析了与CI使用时长(3年、4年和5年)及植入时年龄(<24个月与>24个月)相关的结果分数。将TEDIL分数与所有其他结果指标进行比较。

结果

分数随CI使用经验显著提高。较年轻植入组的CAP和SIR显著更高。在封闭式和开放式单音节测试及TEDIL方面,较年轻和较年长植入组之间未观察到显著差异。TEDIL分数与CAP、SIR以及封闭式和开放式单词分数显著相关。TEDIL的平均标准分数接近平均值。

结论

CI使用者的表现随着CI使用经验的增加而改善。24个月前植入CI的使用者往往比24个月后植入CI的使用者具有更好的听觉技能和更清晰的言语。24个月至60个月之间植入CI的使用者在语言发展方面与24个月前植入CI的使用者相似。TEDIL是评估土耳其儿童早期接受性和表达性语言发展的合适工具。

相似文献

1
Assessment of early language development in Turkish children with a cochlear implant using the TEDIL test.使用TEDIL测试评估土耳其语人工耳蜗植入儿童的早期语言发展。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 May;18(3):153-161. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1299392. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
2
Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5.5岁前接受人工耳蜗植入的说普通话儿童的听觉表现和言语可懂度。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):799-803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
3
The effect of age at cochlear implantation outcomes in Saudi children.沙特儿童人工耳蜗植入年龄对植入效果的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Feb;78(2):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.021. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Evaluation of the language development of children with cochlear implant users living in a multilingual environment.评估生活在多语言环境中的人工耳蜗使用者儿童的语言发展。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jan;152:111007. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.111007. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
5
Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.普通话儿童人工耳蜗植入术后1年随访时的早期语前听觉发育及言语感知
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov;75(11):1418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
6
Long-term follow-up of infants (4-11 months) fitted with cochlear implants.对接受人工耳蜗植入的4至11个月婴儿的长期随访。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 Apr;129(4):361-6. doi: 10.1080/00016480802495453.
7
Long-Term Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia.儿童耳蜗神经发育不良行人工耳蜗植入的长期听觉和言语效果。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(3):558-565. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001299. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Effects of lexical characteristics and demographic factors on mandarin chinese open-set word recognition in children with cochlear implants.影响人工耳蜗植入儿童普通话开放式词汇识别的词汇特征和人口统计学因素。
Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):221-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0bc6.
9
Long-term Outcomes in Down Syndrome Children After Cochlear Implantation: Particular Issues and Considerations.唐氏综合征患儿人工耳蜗植入后的长期预后:特殊问题与考虑。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Dec;40(10):1278-1286. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002410.
10
Impact of socioeconomic factors on paediatric cochlear implant outcomes.社会经济因素对儿童人工耳蜗植入效果的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;102:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring speech intelligibility with deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A systematic review.使用聋儿和重听儿童测量言语可懂度:系统评价。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Mar 17;29(2):265-277. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enad054.
2
Do the Age of Implantation, the Widths of Internal Acoustic Canal and Bony Cochlear Nerve Canal Affect the Auditory Performance of Primary School Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants?植入年龄、内耳道宽度和骨性蜗神经管宽度会影响双侧人工耳蜗植入小学生的听觉表现吗?
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;60(2):95-101. doi: 10.4274/tao.2022.2021-9-5. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
Language development in the pediatric cochlear implant patient.
小儿人工耳蜗植入患者的语言发展
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr 19;3(3):209-213. doi: 10.1002/lio2.156. eCollection 2018 Jun.