Noble A J, Robinson A, Marson A G
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Nov;136(5):536-540. doi: 10.1111/ane.12757. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) is an important source of guidance for health professionals when it comes to epilepsy. Their latest recommendation that epilepsy should no longer be called a "disorder," but a "disease" has though caused controversy. The ILAE contends the change will improve epilepsy's image. Some clinicians and other organizations fear the change may not though be accepted by patients as in common parlance "disease" can be associated with "contagiousness"/"infection." To allow practicing clinicians to make informed judgements about what language they use, we completed the first study to assess the preferences of those with epilepsy and significant others and explore if any of their characteristics were associated with preference. Via epilepsy interest groups and associations in England, Wales, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland, 971 patients and significant others were surveyed. Participants identified which of four labels for epilepsy ("disorder," "illness," "disease," "condition") they favoured and rated each using a Likert-scale. Patients' median age was 39; 69% had experienced seizures in the prior year. "Condition" was favoured by most patients (74.3%) and significant others (71.2%). Only 2.2% of patients and 1.2% of significant others chose "disease"; it received a median Likert-rating indicating "strongly dislike." Multinomial logistic regression found it was not possible to reliably distinguish between participants favouring the different terms on the basis of demographics. The ILAE's position is at odds with what most patients and carers want and we discuss the implications of this.
国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)在癫痫问题上是健康专业人士的重要指导来源。然而,其最新建议——癫痫不应再被称为“病症”,而应被称为“疾病”——引发了争议。ILAE认为这一改变将改善癫痫的形象。但一些临床医生和其他组织担心,这一改变可能不会被患者接受,因为在日常用语中,“疾病”可能与“传染性”/“感染”相关联。为了让执业临床医生能够就是否使用某种语言做出明智的判断,我们开展了第一项研究,以评估癫痫患者及其重要他人的偏好,并探讨他们的任何特征是否与偏好相关。通过英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰和爱尔兰共和国的癫痫兴趣小组和协会,对971名患者及其重要他人进行了调查。参与者指出他们喜欢癫痫的四个标签(“病症”、“疾病”、“疾病”、“状况”)中的哪一个,并使用李克特量表对每个标签进行评分。患者的中位年龄为39岁;69%的患者在前一年有过癫痫发作。大多数患者(74.3%)和重要他人(71.2%)更喜欢“状况”。只有2.2%的患者和1.2%的重要他人选择了“疾病”;它在李克特量表上的中位评分表明“非常不喜欢”。多项逻辑回归分析发现,无法根据人口统计学特征可靠地区分倾向于不同术语的参与者。ILAE的立场与大多数患者和护理人员的意愿不一致,我们讨论了这一情况的影响。