Planning, Evaluation and Management Service, General Directorate of Health, Government of Navarre, Calle Irunlarrea 3 (Pabellón Docencia del Hospital de Navarra), 31008, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
Subdirectorate of Pharmacy, Navarre Regional Health Service, Plaza de la Paz s/n, 31002, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;83(9):2034-2044. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13288. Epub 2017 Apr 16.
To evaluate the association between use of different oral antidiabetic agents (OAD) and the risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with type-2 diabetes (T2DM).
Case-control study nested in a cohort of patients with T2DM and use of OAD between 2002 and 2013, based in a Spanish general practice research database. Cases were people diagnosed with T2DM, aged >18 years and with a validated diagnosis of CAP between 2002 and 2013. Ten controls were matched on age, sex and calendar year. Odds ratio (OR) of CAP was estimated comparing patients treated with: (1) metformin vs. other monotherapies or no antidiabetic treatment; (2) metformin + sulfonylureas vs. other antidiabetic combinations. OR of CAP was also assessed according to antidiabetic treatment duration.
From a cohort of 76 009 T2DM patients, we identified 1803 cases of CAP. No difference in the incidence of CAP was observed when comparing any OAD in monotherapy with metformin. Compared with current use of metformin + sulfonylurea, thiazolidinediones + metformin was associated with an increased risk of CAP (adjusted OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.40-4.38). The use of any combination with thiazolidinediones was also associated with higher risk of CAP (adjusted OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.22-3.28). Current use of DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of CAP.
No differences in the incidence of CAP were observed between the use of OAD in monotherapy vs. metformin. Thiazolidinedione use in combination was associated with an increase in the risk of CAP when compared to metformin + sulfonylureas. The use of DPP-4 inhibitors was not associated with an increased risk of CAP.
评估 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者使用不同口服降糖药(OAD)与社区获得性肺炎(CAP)风险之间的关联。
本研究为 2002 年至 2013 年间基于西班牙普通实践研究数据库的 T2DM 患者 OAD 使用的病例对照嵌套队列研究。病例组为年龄>18 岁、2002 年至 2013 年间确诊为 T2DM 且有明确 CAP 诊断的患者。对照组按照年龄、性别和日历年份与病例组进行 10 对 1 匹配。比较使用:(1)二甲双胍与其他单药治疗或无降糖治疗;(2)二甲双胍+磺酰脲类与其他降糖联合治疗的患者,评估 CAP 的比值比(OR)。还根据降糖治疗时间评估了 CAP 的 OR。
在 76009 例 T2DM 患者队列中,我们确定了 1803 例 CAP 患者。与使用二甲双胍比较,任何 OAD 单药治疗的 CAP 发生率无差异。与当前使用二甲双胍+磺酰脲类相比,噻唑烷二酮类+二甲双胍与 CAP 风险增加相关(调整后的 OR=2.48,95%CI 1.40-4.38)。使用任何噻唑烷二酮类药物联合治疗也与 CAP 风险增加相关(调整后的 OR=2.00,95%CI 1.22-3.28)。当前使用 DPP-4 抑制剂与 CAP 风险增加无关。
OAD 单药治疗与二甲双胍相比,CAP 的发生率无差异。与二甲双胍+磺酰脲类相比,噻唑烷二酮类联合使用与 CAP 风险增加相关。DPP-4 抑制剂的使用与 CAP 风险增加无关。