• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终关怀服务因照护地点而异:养老院、辅助生活设施与居家照护的比较

Variation in Hospice Services by Location of Care: Nursing Home Versus Assisted Living Facility Versus Home.

作者信息

Unroe Kathleen T, Bernard Brittany, Stump Timothy E, Tu Wanzhu, Callahan Christopher M

机构信息

Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1490-1496. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14826. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.14826
PMID:28295145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5507730/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe differences in hospice services for patients living at home, in nursing homes or in assisted living facilities, including the overall number and duration of visits by different hospice care providers across varying lengths of stay.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using hospice patient electronic medical record data.

SETTING

Large, national hospice provider.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from 32,605 hospice patients who received routine hospice care from 2009 to 2014 were analyzed.

MEASUREMENTS

Descriptive statistics were calculated for utilization measures for each type of provider and by location of care. Frequency and duration of service contacts were standardized to a 1 week period and pairwise comparisons were used to detect differences in care provided between the three settings.

RESULTS

Minimal differences were found in overall intensity of service contacts across settings, however, the mix of services were different for patients living at home versus nursing home versus assisted living facility. Overall, more nurse care was provided at the beginning and end of the hospice episode; intensity of aide care services was higher in the middle portion of the hospice episode. Nearly 43% of the sample had hospice stays less than 2 weeks and up to 20% had stays greater than 6 months.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences between characteristics of hospice patients in different settings, as well as the mix of services they receive. Medicare hospice payment methodology was revised starting in 2016. While the new payment structure is in greater alignment with the U shape distribution of services, it will be important to evaluate the impact of the new payment methodology on length of stay and mix of services by different providers across settings of care.

摘要

目的

描述在家中、养老院或辅助生活设施中居住的临终关怀患者所接受的临终关怀服务差异,包括不同临终关怀护理提供者在不同住院时长内的探访总次数和时长。

设计

使用临终关怀患者电子病历数据进行回顾性队列研究。

设置

大型全国性临终关怀服务提供商。

参与者

分析了2009年至2014年期间接受常规临终关怀护理的32,605名临终关怀患者的数据。

测量

计算每种类型提供者以及按护理地点划分的利用指标的描述性统计数据。将服务接触的频率和时长标准化为1周时间段,并使用成对比较来检测三种护理环境之间提供的护理差异。

结果

不同环境下服务接触的总体强度差异极小,然而,在家中、养老院和辅助生活设施中居住的患者所接受的服务组合有所不同。总体而言,在临终关怀期间的开始和结束阶段提供了更多的护士护理;在临终关怀期间的中间阶段,护工护理服务强度更高。近43%的样本临终关怀住院时长少于2周,高达20%的样本住院时长超过6个月。

结论

不同环境下临终关怀患者的特征以及他们所接受的服务组合存在显著差异。医疗保险临终关怀支付方法于2016年开始修订。虽然新的支付结构与服务的U形分布更趋一致,但评估新支付方法对不同提供者在不同护理环境下的住院时长和服务组合的影响将非常重要。

相似文献

1
Variation in Hospice Services by Location of Care: Nursing Home Versus Assisted Living Facility Versus Home.临终关怀服务因照护地点而异:养老院、辅助生活设施与居家照护的比较
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1490-1496. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14826. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
2
Quality of Hospice Care at Home Versus in an Assisted Living Facility or Nursing Home.居家、安养院和养老院临终关怀服务质量的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):687-692. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15260. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
3
Hospice Visit Patterns in the Last Seven Days of Life and the Service Intensity Add-On Payment.生命最后七天的临终关怀探访模式与服务强度附加支付
J Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;20(12):1378-1384. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0214. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Survival in hospice patients with dementia: the effect of home hospice and nurse visits.痴呆症临终关怀患者的生存:家庭临终关怀和护士探访的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jun;69(6):1529-1538. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17066. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Hospice Care in Assisted Living Facilities Versus at Home: Results of a Multisite Cohort Study.辅助生活设施与家中的临终关怀:一项多地点队列研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13429.
6
Differences in Caregiver Reports of the Quality of Hospice Care Across Settings.不同环境下临终关怀照护质量的照护者报告差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1218-1225. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16361. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Hospice use among nursing home patients.养老院患者的临终关怀使用情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Apr;14(4):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
8
Hospice effect on government expenditures among nursing home residents.临终关怀对养老院居民政府支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):134-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00746.x.
9
Variation in Hospice Aide Care by Residential Setting.临终关怀助手护理的居住环境差异。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Aug;27(8):1018-1025. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0585. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
10
Government expenditures at the end of life for short- and long-stay nursing home residents: differences by hospice enrollment status.短期和长期入住养老院居民临终时的政府支出:临终关怀登记状态的差异
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Aug;52(8):1284-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52357.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Hospice Aide Care by Residential Setting.临终关怀助手护理的居住环境差异。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Aug;27(8):1018-1025. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0585. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
Hospice Aide Visits among Nursing Home Residents During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠肺炎疫情早期阶段养老院居民接受临终关怀助理探访的情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):911-916.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.028. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
3
Defining a taxonomy of Medicare-funded home-based clinical care using claims data.使用索赔数据定义医疗保险资助的家庭临床护理分类法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09081-8.
4
Post-acute care transitions and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries in assisted living communities.辅助生活社区中医疗保险受益人的急性后期护理过渡与结局
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1429-1441. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17669. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.非裔美国人和白人养老院居民的偏好重要性评分。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;46(1):111-121. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.2007436. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Governance of Assisted Living in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Literature Review.长期护理中的辅助生活治理:系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111352.
7
Service Availability in Assisted Living and Other Community-Based Residential Settings at the End of Life.临终时辅助生活和其他社区居住环境中的服务可用性。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;24(11):1682-1688. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0625. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
8
Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.国际常规实践中死亡前姑息治疗的持续时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 26;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01829-x.
9
Organizational Characteristics of Assisted Living Communities With Policies Supportive of Admitting and Retaining Residents in Need of End-of-Life Care.具有支持接纳和留住临终关怀需求居民政策的辅助生活社区的组织特征。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Aug;38(8):947-953. doi: 10.1177/1049909120968254. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
10
Family Caregiving at the End of Life and Hospice Use: A National Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.生命末期的家庭护理和临终关怀使用:一项针对 Medicare 受益人的全国性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2288-2296. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16648. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdisciplinary Team Care and Hospice Team Provider Visit Patterns during the Last Week of Life.生命末期的跨学科团队照护与临终关怀团队提供者访视模式
J Palliat Med. 2016 May;19(5):482-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0198. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
2
Effect of Hospice Use on Costs of Care for Long-Stay Nursing Home Decedents.临终关怀服务对长期护理院死者护理费用的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Apr;64(4):723-30. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14070. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
3
Hospice Care in Assisted Living Facilities Versus at Home: Results of a Multisite Cohort Study.辅助生活设施与家中的临终关怀:一项多地点队列研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13429.
4
Changes in Medicare costs with the growth of hospice care in nursing homes.随着疗养院临终关怀服务的发展,医疗保险费用的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1823-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1408705.
5
Developing palliative care practice guidelines and standards for nursing home-based palliative care teams: a Delphi study.制定疗养院姑息治疗护理团队的姑息治疗实践指南和标准:一项德尔菲研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jan;16(1):86.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
6
Hospice use among nursing home and non-nursing home patients.疗养院和非疗养院患者的临终关怀使用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb;30(2):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3080-x. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Medicare program; FY 2015 hospice wage index and payment rate update; hospice quality reporting requirements and process and appeals for Part D payment for drugs for beneficiaries enrolled in hospice. Final rule.医疗保险计划;2015财年临终关怀工资指数及支付率更新;临终关怀质量报告要求、流程以及对参加临终关怀的受益人的D部分药品支付申诉。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2014 Aug 22;79(163):50451-510.
8
Medicare's hospice benefit: analysis of utilization and resource use.医疗保险的临终关怀福利:利用情况与资源使用分析
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Jul 29;4(2). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.004.02.b03. eCollection 2014.
9
All hospice patients are not equal: development of a visit-based acuity index.并非所有临终关怀患者都相同:基于访视的 acuity 指数的开发。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;17(2):135-40. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0109. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
10
Hospice enrollment saves money for Medicare and improves care quality across a number of different lengths-of-stay.临终关怀入院可以为医疗保险节省资金,并提高多种不同住院时间的护理质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):552-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0851.