Department of Healthcare, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Department of Healthcare, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1218-1225. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16361. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
To examine variation in reported experiences with hospice care by setting.
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Hospice (CAHPS®) Survey data from 2016 were analyzed. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine differences in measure scores by setting of care (home, nursing home [NH], hospital, freestanding hospice inpatient unit [IPU], and assisted living facility [ALF]).
A total of 2636 US hospices.
A total of 311 635 primary caregivers of patients who died in hospice.
Outcomes were seven hospice quality measures, including five composite measures that assess aspects of hospice care important to patients and families, including hospice team communication, timeliness of care, treating family member with respect, symptom management, and emotional and spiritual support, and two global measures of the overall rating of the hospice and willingness to recommend it to friends and family. Analyses were adjusted for mode of survey administration and differences in case-mix between hospices.
Caregivers of decedents who received hospice care in a NH reported significantly worse experiences than caregivers of those in the home for all measures. ALF scores were also significantly lower than home for all measures, except providing emotional and spiritual support. Differences in NH and ALF settings compared to home were particularly large for hospice team communication (ranging from -11 to -12 on a 0-100 scale) and getting help for symptoms (ranging from -7 to -10). Consistently across all care settings, hospice team communication, treating family member with respect, and providing emotional and spiritual support were most strongly associated with overall rating of care.
Important opportunities exist to improve quality of hospice care in NHs and ALFs. Quality improvement and regulatory interventions targeting the NH and ALF settings are needed to ensure that all hospice decedents and their family receive high-quality, patient- and family-centered hospice care. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1218-1225, 2020.
考察不同环境下临终关怀体验报告的差异。
分析 2016 年消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统临终关怀(CAHPS®)调查数据。采用多元线性回归分析,按护理环境(家庭、养老院[NH]、医院、独立临终关怀住院病房[IPU]和辅助生活设施[ALF])比较各测量指标得分的差异。
共 2636 家美国临终关怀机构。
共 311635 名在临终关怀机构去世的患者的主要照顾者。
结局是 7 项临终关怀质量指标,包括 5 项综合指标,评估对患者和家属重要的临终关怀方面,包括临终关怀团队沟通、护理及时性、尊重家属、症状管理、情感和精神支持,以及对临终关怀的总体评价和向朋友和家人推荐的意愿的两项全球指标。分析调整了调查管理模式和临终关怀机构病例组合之间的差异。
在 NH 接受临终关怀的患者的护理者报告的体验明显差于家庭护理者,所有指标均如此。除提供情感和精神支持外,与家庭相比,辅助生活设施的 ALF 评分也显著较低。NH 和 ALF 环境与家庭环境相比的差异,在临终关怀团队沟通方面尤其大(0-100 量表上的范围为-11 到-12),在获取症状帮助方面的差异为-7 到-10。在所有护理环境中,临终关怀团队沟通、尊重家庭成员和提供情感和精神支持与整体护理评价最密切相关。
在 NH 和 ALF 中提高临终关怀质量的机会很多。需要进行质量改进和监管干预,以确保所有临终关怀患者及其家属都能获得高质量、以患者和家庭为中心的临终关怀。美国老年学会杂志 68:1218-1225,2020。