Hartwell Erica E, Serovich Julianne M, Reed Sandra J, Boisvert Danielle, Falbo Teresa
Fairfield University.
University of South Florida.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2017 Jul;43(3):482-501. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12220. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
The purpose of this study is to review samples from research on gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) issues and to evaluate the suitability of this body of research to support affirmative and evidence-based practice with GLB clients. The authors systematically reviewed the sampling methodology and sample composition of GLB-related research. All original, quantitative articles focusing on GLB issues published in couple and family therapy (CFT)-related journals since 1975 were coded (n = 153). Results suggest that within the GLB literature base there is some evidence of heterocentrism as well as neglect of issues of class, race, and gender. Suggestions to improve the diversity and representativeness of samples-and, thus, clinical implications-of GLB-related research in CFT literature are provided.
本研究的目的是回顾有关男同性恋、女同性恋和双性恋（GLB）问题的研究样本，并评估这一研究主体对于为GLB客户提供积极且基于证据的服务的适用性。作者系统地回顾了GLB相关研究的抽样方法和样本构成。对1975年以来发表在夫妻与家庭治疗（CFT）相关期刊上的所有聚焦GLB问题的原创定量文章进行了编码（n = 153）。结果表明，在GLB文献库中，存在一些异性中心主义的证据，以及对阶级、种族和性别问题的忽视。本文还提出了一些建议，以提高CFT文献中GLB相关研究样本的多样性和代表性，进而改善其临床意义。
