Liu Yanping, Huang Ren, Gao Dingguo, Reichle Erik D
Department of Psychology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Sun Yat-sen University.
School of Psychology, University of Southampton.
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6:1264-1287. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12487. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
There are two accounts of how readers of unspaced writing systems (e.g., Chinese) know where to move their eyes: (a) saccades are directed toward default targets (e.g., centers of words that have been segmented in the parafovea); or (b) saccade lengths are adjusted dynamically, as a function of ongoing parafoveal processing. This article reports an eye-movement experiment supporting the latter hypothesis by demonstrating that the slope of the relationship between the saccade launch site on word N and the subsequent fixation landing site on word N + 1 is > 1, suggesting that saccades are lengthened from launch sites that afford more parafoveal processing. This conclusion is then evaluated and confirmed via simulations using implementations of both hypotheses (Liu, Reichle, & Li, 2016), with a discussion of these results for our understanding of saccadic targeting during reading and existing models of eye-movement control.
关于阅读无空格书写系统(如中文)的读者如何知道眼睛该看向何处,有两种说法:(a)扫视朝向默认目标(如在副中央凹中已被分割的单词中心);或者(b)扫视长度根据正在进行的副中央凹加工动态调整。本文报告了一项眼动实验,通过证明单词N上的扫视起始位置与单词N + 1上随后的注视着陆位置之间关系的斜率大于1,支持了后一种假设,这表明扫视从提供更多副中央凹加工的起始位置被拉长。然后通过使用两种假设的实现进行模拟(Liu, Reichle, & Li, 2016)对这一结论进行评估和确认,并讨论这些结果对于我们理解阅读过程中的扫视目标定位以及现有眼动控制模型的意义。