• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管通路摆动段狭窄的血管内治疗:现状与未来方向

Endovascular treatment of swing-segment stenosis in vascular access: current status and future directions.

作者信息

de Graaf Rick

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht - The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):74-76. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000704. Epub 2017 Mar 5.

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000704
PMID:28297064
Abstract

Swing-segment lesions are a fairly common reason for access failure and predispose to repeated interventions. The pathophysiology, hemodynamic circumstances and the primary intervention might all play a role in early recurrence. Mainly, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), bare metal stenting and stent graft implantation have been performed to prolong lesion patency and access circuit patency. The available data on endovascular treatment of swing-segment lesions are scarce, heterogeneous and of poor quality. Moreover, with the continuous evolution of endovascular techniques and introduction of new devices there is a risk of increasing device-specific investigations. In the meantime, PTA is easily discarded in favor of novel stents and stent grafts. However, PTA might still have an important position in the overall treatment strategy to postpone loss of the vascular access site. However, without optimal post-interventional imaging, true PTA results remain obscure and indications for additional stent (graft) implantation unclear. Currently, it seems that different devices are utilized to prolong lesion patency rather than access circuit patency. Obviously, more randomized controlled trials and well-structured multicenter registries may be capable of determining a superior treatment modality for a specific lesion. However, it might be more accurate to identify the optimal sequence of interventions by which the lifespan of the access site is maintained as long as possible.

摘要

摆动段病变是通路失败的常见原因,且易导致反复干预。病理生理学、血流动力学情况及初次干预可能都在早期复发中起作用。主要通过经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)、裸金属支架置入术和支架移植物植入术来延长病变通畅时间和通路循环通畅时间。关于摆动段病变血管内治疗的现有数据稀少、异质性强且质量差。此外,随着血管内技术的不断发展和新器械的引入,存在增加器械特异性研究的风险。与此同时,PTA很容易被新型支架和支架移植物取代。然而,PTA在推迟血管通路部位丧失的整体治疗策略中可能仍占有重要地位。然而,若没有最佳的介入后成像,真正的PTA结果仍不明确,额外植入支架(移植物)的指征也不清楚。目前,似乎使用不同的器械来延长病变通畅时间而非通路循环通畅时间。显然,更多的随机对照试验和结构良好的多中心注册研究或许能够确定针对特定病变的更优治疗方式。然而,确定能尽可能延长通路部位使用寿命的最佳干预顺序可能更为准确。

相似文献

1
Endovascular treatment of swing-segment stenosis in vascular access: current status and future directions.血管通路摆动段狭窄的血管内治疗:现状与未来方向
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):74-76. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000704. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
2
Management of transposed arteriovenous fistula swing point stenosis at the basilic vein angle of transposition by stent grafts.采用覆膜支架治疗转位至贵要静脉角的动静脉内瘘转位点狭窄
J Vasc Access. 2017 Nov 17;18(6):482-487. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000770. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Use of the Viabahn stent graft for the treatment of recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in hemodialysis accesses.使用 Viabahn 支架移植物治疗血液透析通路中头臂动脉再狭窄。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;67(2):522-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
4
Stent-grafts versus angioplasty and/or bare metal stents for failing arteriovenous grafts: a cross-over longitudinal study.支架移植物与血管成形术和/或裸金属支架治疗失败的动静脉移植物:一项交叉纵向研究。
J Nephrol. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):389-95. doi: 10.5301/jn.5000161. Epub 2012 May 17.
5
Complications of endovascular grafts in the treatment of pseudoaneurysms and stenoses in arteriovenous access.血管内移植物治疗动静脉通路假性动脉瘤和狭窄的并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;57(1):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.087. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
6
Endovascular stent-graft treatment for graft-vein anastomotic stenosis in haemodialysis patients with arteriovenous grafts.血管内支架移植物治疗动静脉内瘘透析患者的移植静脉吻合口狭窄
Vasa. 2015 Nov;44(6):466-72. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000470.
7
Stent grafts for treatment of cannulation zone stenosis and arteriovenous graft venous anastomosis.用于治疗插管区狭窄和动静脉移植物静脉吻合术的支架移植物。
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):47-52. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000680. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
8
Endovascular treatment of cephalic arch stenosis in brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.头臂动静脉瘘头臂干弓狭窄的血管内治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2019 Jul;20(4):345-355. doi: 10.1177/1129729818814466. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
9
A Prospective, Randomized Study of an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Stent Graft versus Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis in Arteriovenous Grafts and Fistulae: Two-Year Results of the RESCUE Study.一项关于膨体聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与球囊血管成形术治疗动静脉移植物和内瘘支架内再狭窄的前瞻性随机研究:RESCUE研究的两年结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Equivalent secondary patency rates of upper extremity Vectra Vascular Access Grafts and transposed brachial-basilic fistulas with aggressive access surveillance and endovascular treatment.通过积极的通路监测和血管内治疗,上肢Vectra血管通路移植物与转位肱动脉-贵要静脉内瘘的等效二级通畅率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):407-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.061. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of secondary procedures for maintaining arteriovenous hemodialysis access patency: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.维持动静脉血液透析通路通畅的二级手术的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 21;9(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01435-1.
2
Hemodialysis reinitiation using a resurrected mummy fistula: a case report.重新启用木乃伊化瘘管进行血液透析:病例报告。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Oct 26;19(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1089-9.