• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持动静脉血液透析通路通畅的二级手术的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。

Efficacy and safety of secondary procedures for maintaining arteriovenous hemodialysis access patency: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N6N5, Canada.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, Ottawa, ON, K1Y4E9, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 21;9(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01435-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-020-01435-1
PMID:32825841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7442986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous (AV) hemodialysis access creation is recommended by international guidelines as the preferred method of hemodialysis access. However, most AV access sites will require revision to maintain patency. Although several treatment options exist, many have not been directly compared. We intend to compare the relative effectiveness of methods to maintain post-intervention primary patency of failing AV access.

METHODS

We will search EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, trial registries, the grey literature, and ancestry and citation search from January 1977 to present, for randomized controlled trials comparing interventions to maintain primary patency of AV access. Two investigators will independently and blindly review all identified citations and extract data from included studies. The primary outcome is the primary patency 6 months after intervention. Secondary outcomes include immediate technical and functional success, reinterventions, patency, and mortality. Risk of bias, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses are planned.

DISCUSSION

There are a number of treatment modalities for the management of failing AV access. However, most modalities have only been directly compared with plain old balloon angioplasty, and currently synthesized evidence focuses on individual pairwise comparisons. In light of the lack of comprehensively synthesized evidence and clinical equipoise, our study intends to synthesize currently available evidence though it is unclear which treatment modality is most effective.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID CRD42020148224.

摘要

背景

国际指南建议动静脉(AV)血液透析通路的建立作为血液透析通路的首选方法。然而,大多数 AV 通路都需要进行修改以保持通畅。尽管有几种治疗选择,但许多选择尚未进行直接比较。我们旨在比较维持失功 AV 通路术后一期通畅的各种方法的相对有效性。

方法

我们将从 1977 年 1 月到现在,在 EMBASE、MEDLINE、CENTRAL、试验登记处、灰色文献以及追溯和引文搜索中,检索比较干预措施以维持 AV 通路一期通畅的随机对照试验。两名调查员将独立地、盲法地对所有识别出的参考文献进行审查,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。主要结局是干预后 6 个月的一期通畅率。次要结局包括即刻技术和功能成功率、再干预、通畅率和死亡率。计划进行偏倚风险、亚组分析和敏感性分析。

讨论

有许多治疗方法可用于管理失功的 AV 通路。然而,大多数方法仅与传统的单纯球囊血管成形术进行了直接比较,而目前综合证据主要集中在个体的两两比较上。鉴于缺乏全面综合的证据和临床均衡性,我们的研究旨在通过综合目前可用的证据来解决这一问题,但尚不清楚哪种治疗方法最有效。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42020148224。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c176/7442986/66d71d6b7fa1/13643_2020_1435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c176/7442986/66d71d6b7fa1/13643_2020_1435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c176/7442986/66d71d6b7fa1/13643_2020_1435_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of secondary procedures for maintaining arteriovenous hemodialysis access patency: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.维持动静脉血液透析通路通畅的二级手术的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 21;9(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01435-1.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Interventions for paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose.对乙酰氨基酚过量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 23;2(2):CD003328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003328.pub3.
9
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
10
Percutaneous thrombectomy or ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia.经皮血栓切除术或超声辅助溶栓治疗急性肢体缺血的初始管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 4;1(1):CD013486. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013486.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
2
Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Hemodialysis Circuits: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物涂层球囊血管成形术在血液透析通路中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):483-494.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Endovascular treatment of cephalic arch stenosis in brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
头臂动静脉瘘头臂干弓狭窄的血管内治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2019 Jul;20(4):345-355. doi: 10.1177/1129729818814466. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Stent graft placement versus angioplasty for hemodialysis access failure: a meta-analysis.支架移植物置入术与血管成形术治疗血液透析通路失败的Meta分析
J Surg Res. 2018 Jun;226:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
5
Medicare Costs Associated With Arteriovenous Fistulas Among US Hemodialysis Patients.美国血液透析患者动静脉瘘相关的医疗保险费用。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jul;72(1):10-18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Role of stents in hemodialysis vascular access.支架在血液透析血管通路中的作用。
J Vasc Access. 2018 Jul;19(4):341-345. doi: 10.1177/1129729818761280. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Clinical Trial End Points for Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Background, Rationale, and Definitions.血液透析血管通路的临床试验终点:背景、原理及定义
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):490-494. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13321216. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Interventions for treating central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction.治疗中心静脉血液透析导管故障的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 26;10(10):CD011953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011953.pub2.
9
Endovascular treatment of swing-segment stenosis in vascular access: current status and future directions.血管通路摆动段狭窄的血管内治疗:现状与未来方向
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):74-76. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000704. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
10
Stent grafts for treatment of cannulation zone stenosis and arteriovenous graft venous anastomosis.用于治疗插管区狭窄和动静脉移植物静脉吻合术的支架移植物。
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):47-52. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000680. Epub 2017 Mar 5.