Huang J B, Lan C Q, Li H Y, Chen L, Pan J G, Chen L L, Weng H, Zeng Y M
Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital of Fujian, Educational Hospital of Fujian Medical University (on-the-job graduate student in the Second Clinical College of Fujian Medical University), Fuzhou 350008, China.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 12;40(3):188-192. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.03.009.
To study the value of an early (mechanical ventilation after 24 h) non-sedation protocol for intubated, mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU). Seventy intubated, mechanically ventilated patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to management with early non-sedation (intervention group; =35) or with daily interruption of sedation (DIS) (control group; =35). The duration of mechanical ventilation, length of the RICU and hospital stay, RICU and hospital mortality, drug consumption, RICU and hospitalization expenses, incidence of complications and adverse events and serum levels of vital organ damage and inflammatory markers after mechanical ventilation for 48 h were recorded and compared. Patients in the intervention group had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation than those in the control group [(7±5) (11±9) d, <0.05] and were discharged from the RICU [(9±7) (18±9) d, <0.05] and hospital earlier [(17±14) (29±22) d, <0.05] than those in the control group. The doses of midazolam were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group [(99±104) vs (482±337) mg, <0.05]. The RICU and hospitalization expenses were both significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group [53(84) vs 88(173), 72(195) vs 154(234) thousand CHY, <0.05]. In the intervention group, the occurrence rates of ventilator associated pneumonia (23% vs 46%), tracheotomy (14% vs 37%) and gastrointestinal adverse reactions (17% vs 40%) were significantly lower than those in the control group (<0.05). No differences were recorded in RICU and hospital mortality (>0.05). The occurrence rates of unplanned extubation and reintubation and the need for CT brain scans were similar in the 2 groups (>0.05). The levels of cardiac, liver and renal damage markers, lactic acid and C-reactive protein were the same in both groups (>0.05). The early non-sedation protocol decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the RICU and hospital, and it did not increase the incidence of complications and adverse events.
研究早期(24小时后机械通气)非镇静方案对呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)中插管并接受机械通气患者的价值。前瞻性纳入70例插管并接受机械通气的患者,并将其随机分为早期非镇静管理组(干预组;n = 35)和每日中断镇静组(DIS,对照组;n = 35)。记录并比较机械通气时间、RICU住院时间和住院时间、RICU和医院死亡率、药物消耗、RICU和住院费用、并发症和不良事件发生率以及机械通气48小时后重要器官损伤和炎症标志物的血清水平。干预组患者的机械通气时间短于对照组[(7±5) (11±9)天,P<0.05],且比对照组更早从RICU出院[(9±7) (18±9)天,P<0.05]以及更早从医院出院[(17±14) (29±22)天,P<0.05]。干预组咪达唑仑剂量显著低于对照组[(99±104)mg对(482±337)mg,P<0.05]。干预组的RICU和住院费用均显著低于对照组[53(84)对88(173),72(195)对154(234)千元人民币,P<0.05]。干预组中呼吸机相关性肺炎(23%对46%)、气管切开术(14%对37%)和胃肠道不良反应(17%对40%)的发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。RICU和医院死亡率无差异(P>0.05)。两组计划外拔管和重新插管的发生率以及脑部CT扫描的需求相似(P>0.05)。两组心脏、肝脏和肾脏损伤标志物、乳酸和C反应蛋白水平相同(P>0.05)。早期非镇静方案缩短了机械通气时间以及在RICU和医院的住院时间,且未增加并发症和不良事件的发生率。