Suppr超能文献

即刻中断镇静治疗与重症术后患者常规镇静护理的比较(SOS-Ventilation):一项随机、平行组临床试验。

Immediate interruption of sedation compared with usual sedation care in critically ill postoperative patients (SOS-Ventilation): a randomised, parallel-group clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Montpellier University Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France; PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Montpellier University Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Oct;5(10):795-805. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30304-1. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Avoidance of excessive sedation and subsequent prolonged mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) is recommended, but no data are available for critically ill postoperative patients. We hypothesised that in such patients stopping sedation immediately after admission to the ICU could reduce unnecessary sedation and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We did a randomised, parallel-group, clinical trial at three ICUs in France. Stratified randomisation with minimisation (1:1 via a restricted web platform) was used to assign eligible patients (aged ≥18 years, admitted to an ICU after abdominal surgery, and expected to require at least 12 h of mechanical ventilation because of a critical illness defined by a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >1 for any organ, but without severe acute respiratory distress syndrome or brain injury) to usual sedation care provided according to recommended practices (control group) or to immediate interruption of sedation (intervention group). The primary outcome was the time to successful extubation (defined as the time from randomisation to the time of extubation [or tracheotomy mask] for at least 48 h). All patients who underwent randomisation (except for those who were excluded after randomisation) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01486121.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 2, 2011, and Feb 27, 2014, 137 patients were randomly assigned to the control (n=68) or intervention groups (n=69). In the intention-to-treat analysis, time to successful extubation was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (median 8 h [IQR 4-36] vs 50 h [29-93], group difference -33·6 h [95% CI -44·9 to -22·4]; p<0·0001). The adjusted hazard ratio was 5·2 (95% CI 3·1-8·8, p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Immediate interruption of sedation in critically ill postoperative patients with organ dysfunction who were admitted to the ICU after abdominal surgery improved outcomes compared with usual sedation care. These findings support interruption of sedation in these patients following transfer from the operating room.

FUNDING

Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation du Groupement de Coopération Sanitaire de la Mission d'Enseignement, de Recherche, de Référence et d'Innovation (DRCI-GCS-MERRI) de Montpellier-Nîmes.

摘要

背景

建议在重症监护病房(ICU)中避免过度镇静和随后的长时间机械通气,但对于危重症术后患者尚无相关数据。我们假设,对于此类患者,在入住 ICU 后立即停止镇静,可以减少不必要的镇静,并改善患者结局。

方法

我们在法国的三个 ICU 进行了一项随机、平行分组、临床试验。使用分层最小化随机分组(通过受限的网络平台进行 1:1 随机化),将符合条件的患者(年龄≥18 岁,因任何器官的序贯器官衰竭评估评分>1 而被定义为患有危重病,需要接受至少 12 小时的机械通气,但没有严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征或脑损伤)分配至根据推荐实践提供的常规镇静护理(对照组)或立即停止镇静(干预组)。主要结局是成功拔管的时间(定义为从随机分组到拔管(或气管切开面罩)时间至少 48 小时)。所有接受随机分组的患者(除了随机分组后被排除的患者)均纳入意向治疗分析。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01486121。

结果

2011 年 12 月 2 日至 2014 年 2 月 27 日期间,共有 137 名患者被随机分配至对照组(n=68)或干预组(n=69)。在意向治疗分析中,干预组的成功拔管时间明显短于对照组(中位数 8 小时 [IQR 4-36] 比 50 小时 [29-93],组间差异-33·6 小时 [95%CI-44·9 至-22·4];p<0·0001)。调整后的危险比为 5·2(95%CI 3·1-8·8,p<0·0001)。

解释

对于因器官功能障碍而在腹部手术后入住 ICU 的危重症术后患者,立即停止镇静与常规镇静护理相比,改善了结局。这些发现支持在这些患者从手术室转入后停止镇静。

资金

蒙彼利埃-尼姆教学、研究、参考和创新使命教学、研究、参考和创新协作组(DRCI-GCS-MERRI)的临床研究和创新代表团。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验