Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine; and.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1392-1397. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS16954. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
OBJECTIVE Selecting the appropriate patients undergoing craniotomy who can safely forgo postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring remains a source of debate. Through a multidisciplinary work group, the authors redefined their institutional care process for postoperative monitoring of patients undergoing elective craniotomy to include transfer from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to the neurosurgical floor. The hypothesis was that an appropriately selected group of patients undergoing craniotomy could be safely managed outside the ICU in the postoperative period. METHODS The work group developed and implemented a protocol for transfer of patients to the neurosurgical floor after 4-hour recovery in the PACU following elective craniotomy for supratentorial tumor. Criteria included hemodynamically stable adults without significant new postoperative neurological impairment. Data were prospectively collected including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, and events surrounding transfer to a higher level of care. RESULTS Of the first 200 consecutive patients admitted to the floor, 5 underwent escalation of care in the first 48 hours. Three of these escalations were for agitation, 1 for seizure, and 1 for neurological change. Ninety-eight percent of patients meeting criteria for transfer to the floor were managed without incident. No patient experienced a major complication or any permanent morbidity or mortality following this care pathway. CONCLUSIONS Care of patients undergoing uneventful elective supratentorial craniotomy for tumor on a neurosurgical floor after 4 hours of PACU monitoring appears to be a safe practice in this patient population. This tailored practice safely optimized hospital resources, is financially responsible, and is a strong tool for improving health care value.
选择能够安全地避免术后重症监护病房(ICU)监测的择期开颅手术患者仍然存在争议。通过多学科工作组,作者重新定义了他们对接受择期开颅手术患者术后监测的机构护理流程,包括从麻醉后护理单元(PACU)转移到神经外科病房。假设经过适当选择的一组接受开颅手术的患者可以在术后期间安全地在 ICU 之外进行管理。
工作组制定并实施了一项协议,即在 PACU 恢复 4 小时后,将接受择期幕上肿瘤开颅手术的患者转移到神经外科病房。标准包括血流动力学稳定且无明显新术后神经功能障碍的成年人。前瞻性收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、临床特征、手术细节、术后并发症以及向更高级别护理转移的相关事件。
在 200 名连续入院的患者中,前 48 小时有 5 名患者需要升级治疗。其中 3 例升级是因为躁动,1 例是因为癫痫发作,1 例是因为神经变化。符合转移到病房标准的 98%的患者在没有任何事件的情况下得到了管理。按照这种护理途径,没有患者出现重大并发症或任何永久性发病率或死亡率。
在 PACU 监测 4 小时后,对接受幕上肿瘤择期开颅手术且无并发症的患者在神经外科病房进行护理,似乎是该患者人群中一种安全的做法。这种量身定制的做法安全地优化了医院资源,具有财务责任,并且是提高医疗保健价值的有力工具。