Yamamoto Ryuichi
Project Associate Professor, Department of Health Management and Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (
Japan Med Assoc J. 2016 Sep 1;59(2-3):91-109. eCollection 2016 Sep.
Japan was once progressive in the digitalization of healthcare fields but unfortunately has fallen behind in terms of the secondary use of data for public interest. There has recently been a trend to establish large-scale health databases in the nation, and a conflict between data use for public interest and privacy protection has surfaced as this trend has progressed. Databases for health insurance claims or for specific health checkups and guidance services were created according to the law that aims to ensure healthcare for the elderly; however, there is no mention in the act about using these databases for public interest in general. Thus, an initiative for such use must proceed carefully and attentively. The PMDA projects that collect a large amount of medical record information from large hospitals and the health database development project that the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) is working on will soon begin to operate according to a general consensus; however, the validity of this consensus can be questioned if issues of anonymity arise. The likelihood that researchers conducting a study for public interest would intentionally invade the privacy of their subjects is slim. However, patients could develop a sense of distrust about their data being used since legal requirements are ambiguous. Nevertheless, without using patients' medical records for public interest, progress in medicine will grind to a halt. Proper legislation that is clear for both researchers and patients will therefore be highly desirable. A revision of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information is currently in progress. In reality, however, privacy is not something that laws alone can protect; it will also require guidelines and self-discipline. We now live in an information capitalization age. I will introduce the trends in legal reform regarding healthcare information and discuss some basics to help people properly face the issue of health big data and privacy protection with a sense of ownership.
日本曾在医疗保健领域的数字化方面处于领先地位,但不幸的是,在为公共利益进行数据二次利用方面却落后了。最近,日本国内出现了建立大规模健康数据库的趋势,随着这一趋势的发展,公共利益数据使用与隐私保护之间的冲突浮出水面。根据旨在确保老年人医疗保健的法律,创建了医疗保险理赔数据库或特定健康检查及指导服务数据库;然而,该法案中并未提及将这些数据库用于一般公共利益。因此,此类用途的倡议必须谨慎、专注地推进。药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)从大型医院收集大量病历信息的项目,以及厚生劳动省正在开展的健康数据库开发项目,将很快根据普遍共识开始运作;然而,如果出现匿名性问题,这种共识的有效性可能会受到质疑。为公共利益进行研究的研究人员故意侵犯研究对象隐私的可能性很小。然而,由于法律要求不明确,患者可能会对自己的数据被使用产生不信任感。尽管如此,如果不将患者的病历用于公共利益,医学进步将停滞不前。因此,非常需要一部对研究人员和患者都清晰明确的适当立法。目前正在对《个人信息保护法》进行修订。然而,实际上,隐私并非仅靠法律就能保护;还需要指导方针和自律。我们现在生活在一个信息资本化的时代。我将介绍医疗保健信息法律改革的趋势,并讨论一些基本要点,以帮助人们以主人翁意识妥善面对健康大数据和隐私保护问题。