• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于人群的关于在英格兰和纽约州实施急诊阑尾切除术的队列研究。

A Population-Based Cohort Study of Emergency Appendectomy Performed in England and New York State.

作者信息

Al-Khyatt Waleed, Mytton Jemma, Tan Benjamin H L, Aquina Christopher T, Evison Felicity, Fleming Fergal J, Pasquali Sandro, Griffiths Ewen A, Vohra Ravinder S

机构信息

Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.

Department of Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Yardley Court, 11-13 Frederick Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 1JD, UK.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):1975-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3981-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-017-3981-z
PMID:28299474
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare selected outcomes (30-day reoperation and total length of hospital stay) following emergency appendectomy between populations from New York State and England.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used demographic and in-hospital outcome data from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative databases for all patients aged 18+ years undergoing appendectomy between April 2009 and March 2014. Univariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression were used to test significant factors. A one-to-one propensity score matched dataset was created to compare odd ratios (OR) of reoperations between the two populations.

RESULTS

A total of 188,418 patient records, 121,428 (64.4%) from England and 66,990 (35.6%) from NYS, were extracted. Appendectomy was completed laparoscopically in 77.7% of patients in New York State compared to 53.6% in England (P < 0.001). The median lengths of hospital stay for patients undergoing appendectomy were 3 (interquartile range, IQR 2-4) days versus 2 (IQR 1-3) days (P < 0.001) in England and New York State, respectively. All 30-day reoperation rates were higher in England compared to New York State (1.2 vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001), representing nearly a twofold higher risk of 30-day reoperation (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.64-2.14, P < 0.001). As the proportion of appendectomy completed laparoscopically increased, there was a reduction in the reoperation rate in England (correlation coefficient -0.170, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperations and total length of hospital stay is significantly higher following appendectomy in England compared to New York State. Increasing the numbers of appendectomy completed laparoscopically may decrease length of stay and reoperations.

摘要

背景

比较纽约州和英格兰人群急诊阑尾切除术后的特定结局(30天再次手术和住院总时长)。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了医院事件统计(HES)和纽约州全州规划与研究合作系统(SPARCS)行政数据库中的人口统计学和住院结局数据,纳入了2009年4月至2014年3月期间所有接受阑尾切除术的18岁及以上患者。采用单因素和校正多因素逻辑回归分析来检验显著因素。创建了一个一对一倾向评分匹配数据集,以比较两个人群再次手术的比值比(OR)。

结果

共提取了188,418份患者记录,其中121,428份(64.4%)来自英格兰,66,990份(35.6%)来自纽约州。纽约州77.7%的患者通过腹腔镜完成阑尾切除术,而英格兰这一比例为53.6%(P < 0.001)。在英格兰和纽约州,接受阑尾切除术患者的住院中位时长分别为3天(四分位间距,IQR 2 - 4)和2天(IQR 1 - 3)(P < 0.001)。英格兰的所有30天再次手术率均高于纽约州(1.2%对0.6%,P < 0.001),这表明30天再次手术的风险几乎高出两倍(OR 1.88,95% CI 1.64 - 2.14,P < 0.001)。随着腹腔镜阑尾切除术完成比例的增加,英格兰的再次手术率有所降低(相关系数 -0.170,P = 0.036)。

结论

与纽约州相比,英格兰阑尾切除术后的再次手术率和住院总时长显著更高。增加腹腔镜阑尾切除术的数量可能会减少住院时长和再次手术率。

相似文献

1
A Population-Based Cohort Study of Emergency Appendectomy Performed in England and New York State.一项基于人群的关于在英格兰和纽约州实施急诊阑尾切除术的队列研究。
World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):1975-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3981-z.
2
A Comparison of Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy Between Populations From New York State and England.纽约州和英国人群行急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率比较。
Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):280-286. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001964.
3
Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006.成人传统及腹腔镜阑尾切除术:1996年至2006年间英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院的手术结果
Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):800-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b770c.
4
Pediatric Emergency Appendectomy and 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes in District General Hospitals and Specialist Pediatric Surgical Centers in England, April 2001 to March 2012: Retrospective Cohort Study.2001年4月至2012年3月英格兰地区综合医院和专科儿科手术中心的小儿急诊阑尾切除术及术后30天结局:回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):184-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001099.
5
Outcome after introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A cohort study.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的结局:一项队列研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Mar;51(3):449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:基于大型管理数据库的结局比较
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1.
7
The effect of diabetes on outcomes following emergency appendectomy in patients without comorbidities: a propensity score-matched analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.糖尿病对无合并症患者急诊阑尾切除术后结局的影响:一项基于国家外科质量改进计划数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
8
Patterns of readmission and reoperation within 90 days after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后90天内的再入院和再次手术模式。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jul-Aug;5(4):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
9
Predictors of length of stay, reoperation, and readmission following total laryngectomy.全喉切除术后住院时间、再次手术及再入院的预测因素。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1339-1344. doi: 10.1002/lary.26454. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
10
How well do subjective Hospital Compare metrics reflect objective outcomes in spine surgery?主观的医院比较指标在脊柱手术中对客观结果的反映程度如何?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):264-70. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE151155. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Outcomes in Appendicitis Care: Identifying Opportunities to Improve Care.阑尾炎护理的质量结果:识别改善护理的机会。
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 18;10(12):358. doi: 10.3390/life10120358.
2
Managing appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic-What do we need to know from the evidence?在新冠疫情期间管理阑尾炎——我们需要从证据中了解什么?
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13650. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13650.

本文引用的文献

1
Declining Operative Experience for Junior-Level Residents: Is This an Unintended Consequence of Minimally Invasive Surgery?初级住院医师手术经验的下降:这是微创手术的意外后果吗?
J Surg Educ. 2016 Jul-Aug;73(4):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
2
Length of hospital stay after hip fracture and risk of early mortality after discharge in New York state: retrospective cohort study.纽约州髋部骨折后的住院时长及出院后早期死亡风险:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2015 Dec 10;351:h6246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6246.
3
Unplanned readmission after appendectomy.
阑尾切除术后的非计划再入院。
Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
The nature, patterns, clinical outcomes, and financial impact of intraoperative adverse events in emergency surgery.急诊手术中术中不良事件的性质、模式、临床结局及经济影响。
Am J Surg. 2016 Jul;212(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
5
Are we recording postoperative complications correctly? Comparison of NHS Hospital Episode Statistics with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.我们对术后并发症的记录是否准确?英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)医院事件统计数据与美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的比较。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):594-602. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003932. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks.胃肠道吻合口漏的发病率、死亡率、成本和生存估计。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Feb;220(2):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
7
The impact of operative timing on outcomes of appendicitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis.手术时机对阑尾炎治疗结果的影响:一项国家外科质量改进项目分析。
Am J Surg. 2015 Mar;209(3):498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
8
Population level analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy versus normal appendicectomy for acute lower abdominal pain.人群水平分析诊断性腹腔镜检查与常规阑尾切除术治疗急性下腹痛的效果。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
9
Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy.多中心观察性研究:在提供和结果方面,对急诊阑尾切除术表现的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Aug;100(9):1240-52. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9201.
10
Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings.术后并发症的发生与再入院之间的关联:对质量改进和成本节约的影响。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):10-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828e3ac3.