Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joachim en Anna, Center for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Sep;73(9):2084-2102. doi: 10.1111/jan.13299. Epub 2017 May 2.
To evaluate the effects of substituting nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses for physicians in long-term care facilities and primary healthcare for the ageing population (primary aim) and to describe what influences the implementation (secondary aim).
Healthcare for the ageing population is undergoing major changes and physicians face heavy workloads. A solution to guarantee quality and contain costs might be to substitute nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses for physicians.
A systematic literature review.
PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Web of Science; searched January 1995-August 2015.
Study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers. Outcomes collected: patient outcomes, care provider outcomes, process of care outcomes, resource use outcomes, costs and descriptions of the implementation. Data synthesis consisted of a narrative summary.
Two studies used a randomized design and eight studies used other comparative designs. The evidence of the two randomized controlled trials showed no effect on approximately half of the outcomes and a positive effect on the other half of the outcomes. Results of eight other comparative study designs point towards the same direction. The implementation was influenced by factors on a social, organizational and individual level.
Physician substitution in healthcare for the ageing population may achieve at least as good patient outcomes and process of care outcomes compared with care provided by physicians. Evidence about resource use and costs is too limited to draw conclusions.
评估在长期护理机构和老龄化人口的初级医疗保健中,用护士从业者、医师助理或护士替代医生,以及描述影响实施的因素(次要目标)。
老龄化人口的医疗保健正在发生重大变化,医生面临着繁重的工作量。保证质量和控制成本的解决方案可能是用护士从业者、医师助理或护士替代医生。
系统文献综述。
PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、CENTRAL、Web of Science;检索时间 1995 年 1 月至 2015 年 8 月。
研究选择、数据提取和质量评估由两名评审员独立进行。收集的结果:患者结局、护理提供者结局、护理过程结局、资源利用结局、成本和实施描述。数据综合采用叙述性总结。
两项研究采用随机设计,八项研究采用其他比较设计。两项随机对照试验的证据表明,大约一半的结局没有效果,另一半的结局有积极效果。其他八项比较研究设计的结果也指向同一方向。实施受到社会、组织和个人层面因素的影响。
在老龄化人口的医疗保健中,用护士从业者、医师助理或护士替代医生,可能至少能获得与医生提供的治疗相同的患者结局和护理过程结局。关于资源利用和成本的证据还很有限,无法得出结论。