Andrade Margareth Souza, Gonçalves Aline Nogueira, Guedes Renata Lígia Vieira, Barcelos Camila Barbosa, Slobodticov Luciana Dall'Agnol Siqueira, Lopes Simone Aparecida Claudino, Francisco Ana Lúcia Noronha, Angelis Elisabete Carrara de
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
Codas. 2017 Mar 9;29(1):e20150175. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20172015175.
The use of symptom-specific questionnaires on head and neck cancer (HNC), together with objective swallowing measures, can be sensitive to changes in quality of life (QoL) resulting from dysphagia, but this tool is not broadly used as a complement to clinical evaluations.
To analyze the correlation between the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire and videofluoroscopy (VF) in patients treated for head and neck cancer.
This is a retrospective study with review of clinical data, VF and MDADI results. The study sample was composed of adult patients (>18 y.o.) treated for tumors at the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx, regardless of treatment type. For the VF examination, swallowing of 5 and 20 ml of nectar-thick liquids were considered. The Mann-Whitney nonparametric test was applied to evaluate the correlations between the MDADI and VF.
Thirty-nine patients, mostly men (87.18%), with mean age of 61 years participated in the study. Most patients (16) presented oral cavity tumors (41.03%). Twenty-two patients were in advanced clinical stage (IV). Surgery was the most prevalent treatment (41.03%). Approximately half of the participants (20) received oral feeding. The total mean (TM) on the MDADI was 63.36. Comparison between VF and MDADI data showed significant correlation between TM, emotional domain (ED), and physical domain (PD) with penetration during the swallowing of 5 ml. Penetration and aspiration with 20 ml determined worse QoL on the global (p=0.018 and p=0.0053), emotional (p=0.0012 and p=0.027) and physical (p=0.0002 and p=0.0051) domains, and TM (p=0.0023 and p=0.0299), respectively. The presence of stasis did not determine worse QoL.
Patients treated for HNC who presented penetration/aspiration showed worse QoL on the emotional and physical domains of the MDADI.
使用针对头颈癌(HNC)的症状特异性问卷,结合客观吞咽测量,可对头颈癌吞咽困难导致的生活质量(QoL)变化敏感,但该工具并未广泛用作临床评估的补充。
分析接受头颈癌治疗的患者中,MD安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)问卷与视频荧光吞咽造影(VF)之间的相关性。
这是一项回顾性研究,回顾临床数据、VF和MDADI结果。研究样本由成年患者(>18岁)组成,这些患者接受了口腔、口咽、下咽和喉部肿瘤的治疗,无论治疗类型如何。对于VF检查,考虑吞咽5毫升和20毫升蜂蜜样稠液体的情况。应用曼-惠特尼非参数检验来评估MDADI与VF之间的相关性。
39名患者参与了研究,大多数为男性(87.18%),平均年龄61岁。大多数患者(16名)患有口腔肿瘤(41.03%)。22名患者处于临床晚期(IV期)。手术是最常见的治疗方式(41.03%)。大约一半的参与者(20名)接受经口喂养。MDADI的总平均分(TM)为63.36。VF和MDADI数据比较显示,TM、情感领域(ED)和身体领域(PD)与吞咽5毫升时的渗透之间存在显著相关性。吞咽20毫升时的渗透和误吸分别在整体(p=0.018和p=0.0053)、情感(p=0.0012和p=0.027)和身体(p=0.0002和p=0.0051)领域以及TM(p=0.0023和p=0.0299)方面表明生活质量较差。存在淤滞并未表明生活质量较差。
接受头颈癌治疗且出现渗透/误吸的患者在MDADI情感和身体领域表现出较差的生活质量。