• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.六站式多重迷你面试的可靠性与可接受性:研究生医学入学中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z.
2
Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison.研究生入学多对一迷你面试中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较:可靠性与可接受性对比
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 14;15:75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0361-y.
3
Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.多站面试测试的特点:让考生回忆比让他们想象更好。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):604-13. doi: 10.1111/medu.12402.
4
The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.多次小型面试的效用:一所医学院的经验
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):7-14. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
5
The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training.在评估中心用于选拔专科培训的行为多迷你面试的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Aug 13;14:169. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-169.
6
Improving student selection using multiple mini-interviews with multifaceted Rasch modeling.运用多方面 Rasch 模型的多次微型面试提高学生选拔效果。
Acad Med. 2013 Feb;88(2):216-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c0c5d.
7
The reliability and validity of multiple mini interviews (MMIs) in values based recruitment to nursing, midwifery and paramedic practice programmes: Findings from an evaluation study.多站式面试(MMI)在基于价值观的护理、助产和急救护理实践项目招聘中的可靠性和有效性:一项评估研究的结果。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches.多次小型访谈:概念相同,方法各异。
Med Educ. 2014 Dec;48(12):1157-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12535.
9
Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.使用多重迷你面试法评估兽医课程申请者。
J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Summer;36(2):166-73. doi: 10.3138/jvme.36.2.166.
10
Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency.多站式迷你面试用于耳鼻喉科住院医师录取的可接受性和可靠性。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.24122. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Piloting Virtual Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI) on Undergraduate Medical Students: A Multisource Feedback Analysis.本科医学生虚拟多对一面试(MMI)试点:多源反馈分析
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 May 7;16:761-772. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S511568. eCollection 2025.
2
Professional judgement: a social practice perspective on a multiple mini-interview for specialty training selection.专业判断:关于专科培训选拔多重小型面试的社会实践视角
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06535-3.
3
Evidence-Based Practices for Interviewing Graduate Medical Education Applicants: A Systematic Review.基于证据的研究生医学教育申请人面试实践:系统评价。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Apr;16(2):151-165. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00115.1. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Development, Validity and Reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Nursing Students.护理专业学生客观结构化临床考试的开发、效度与信度
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Oct 9;9:23779608231207217. doi: 10.1177/23779608231207217. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
The objective structured clinical examination as an assessment strategy for clinical competence in novice nursing practitioners in Taiwan.客观结构化临床考试作为台湾新手执业护士临床能力的一种评估策略。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 7;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00608-0.
6
Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations.多次小型访谈:关于效用与局限性的当前观点
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Dec 12;10:1031-1038. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S181332. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison.研究生入学多对一迷你面试中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较:可靠性与可接受性对比
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 14;15:75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0361-y.
2
Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.多站面试测试的特点:让考生回忆比让他们想象更好。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):604-13. doi: 10.1111/medu.12402.
3
The multiple mini-interview for selecting medical residents: first experience in the Middle East region.用于选拔住院医师的多重迷你面试:中东地区的首次经验。
Med Teach. 2014 Aug;36(8):703-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907875. Epub 2014 May 7.
4
The multiple mini-interview for emergency medicine resident selection.用于急诊医学住院医师选拔的多重迷你面试。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.119. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency.多站式迷你面试用于耳鼻喉科住院医师录取的可接受性和可靠性。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.24122. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
6
The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review.多站式面试(MMI)在卫生专业培训学生选拔中的应用 - 系统评价。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):1027-41. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.829912. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
7
The multiple mini-interview in the U.K. context: 3 years of experience at Dundee.英国情境下的多站面试:邓迪的 3 年经验
Med Teach. 2012;34(4):297-304. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652706.
8
The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.下一代研究生医学教育认证系统——基本原理与益处
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1051-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1200117. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
9
Resident selection for a physical medicine and rehabilitation program: feasibility and reliability of the multiple mini-interview.物理医学与康复项目的住院医师选拔:多站式迷你面试的可行性和可靠性。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;90(4):330-5. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31820f9677.
10
Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.提高多站式面试在选拔未来医疗保健领导者中的可靠性。
Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):1032-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182223ab7.

六站式多重迷你面试的可靠性与可接受性:研究生医学入学中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较

Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.

作者信息

Yamada Toru, Sato Juichi, Yoshimura Hiroshi, Okubo Tomoya, Hiraoka Eiji, Shiga Takashi, Kubota Tadao, Fujitani Shigeki, Machi Junji, Ban Nobutaro

机构信息

Department of General Medicine/Family & Community Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z
PMID:28302124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5356352/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is increasingly used for postgraduate medical admissions and in undergraduate settings. MMIs use mostly Situational Questions (SQs) rather than Past-Behavioural Questions (PBQs). A previous study of MMIs in this setting, where PBQs and SQs were asked in the same order, reported that the reliability of PBQs was non-inferior to SQs and that SQs were more acceptable to candidates. The order in which the questions are asked may affect reliability and acceptability of an MMI. This study investigated the reliability of an MMI using both PBQs and SQs, minimising question order bias. Acceptability of PBQs and SQs was also assessed.

METHODS

Forty candidates applying for a postgraduate medical admission for 2016-2017 were included; 24 examiners were used. The MMI consisted of six stations with one examiner per station; a PBQ and a SQ were asked at every station, and the order of questions was alternated between stations. Reliability was analysed for scores obtained for PBQs or SQs separately, and for both questions. A post-MMI survey was used to assess the acceptability of PBQs and SQs.

RESULTS

The generalisability (G) coefficients for PBQs only, SQs only, and both questions were 0.87, 0.96, and 0.80, respectively. Decision studies suggested that a four-station MMI would also be sufficiently reliable (G-coefficients 0.82 and 0.94 for PBQs and SQs, respectively). In total, 83% of participants were satisfied with the MMI. In terms of face validity, PBQs were more acceptable than SQs for candidates (p = 0.01), but equally acceptable for examiners (88% vs. 83% positive responses for PBQs vs. SQs; p = 0.377). Candidates preferred PBQs to SQs when asked to choose one, though this difference was not significant (p = 0.081); examiners showed a clear preference for PBQs (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliability and acceptability of six-station MMI were good among 40 postgraduate candidates; modelling suggested that four stations would also be reliable. SQs were more reliable than PBQs. Candidates found PBQs more acceptable than SQs and examiners preferred PBQs when they had to choose between the two. Our findings suggest that it is better to ask both PBQs and SQs during an MMI to maximise acceptability.

摘要

背景

多重迷你面试(MMI)越来越多地用于研究生医学招生和本科阶段。MMI大多使用情境问题(SQ)而非过去行为问题(PBQ)。此前在这种情境下对MMI的一项研究中,PBQ和SQ按相同顺序提问,结果显示PBQ的可靠性不低于SQ,且候选人对SQ的接受度更高。问题的提问顺序可能会影响MMI的可靠性和接受度。本研究调查了同时使用PBQ和SQ的MMI的可靠性,将问题顺序偏差降至最低。还评估了PBQ和SQ的接受度。

方法

纳入40名申请2016 - 2017年研究生医学入学的候选人;使用24名考官。MMI由六个站点组成,每个站点有一名考官;每个站点提出一个PBQ和一个SQ,问题顺序在各站点交替。分别分析PBQ或SQ以及两个问题的得分的可靠性。MMI后调查用于评估PBQ和SQ的接受度。

结果

仅PBQ、仅SQ以及两个问题的概化(G)系数分别为0.87、0.96和0.80。决策研究表明,四站点的MMI也将具有足够的可靠性(PBQ和SQ的G系数分别为0.82和0.94)。总体而言,83%的参与者对MMI感到满意。在表面效度方面,候选人认为PBQ比SQ更可接受(p = 0.01),但考官认为两者同样可接受(PBQ和SQ的积极回应率分别为88%和83%;p = 0.377)。当被要求选择一个时,候选人更喜欢PBQ而非SQ,不过这种差异不显著(p = 0.081);考官对PBQ表现出明显偏好(p = 0.007)。

结论

40名研究生候选人中,六站点MMI的可靠性和接受度良好;模型显示四站点也将可靠。SQ比PBQ更可靠。候选人发现PBQ比SQ更可接受,且当考官必须在两者之间选择时,他们更喜欢PBQ。我们的研究结果表明,在MMI期间同时提出PBQ和SQ以最大化接受度更好。