Li Grace, Wood Ruth I
Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.
Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.
Physiol Behav. 2017 May 15;174:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
While previous studies have demonstrated direct and generalized reciprocity in female Norway rats [26], the present study determined if unrelated male laboratory rats respond on behalf of a partner in an iterated sequential game. Pairs of rats worked for food reward in an operant chamber, where participants alternated as Donor and Responder in successive trials. In each trial, the Donor chose between variable and constant reward levers, where the constant reward lever delivered 1 pellet, and the variable reward lever triggered insertion of Responder lever(s); the Donor received 2 pellets when the Responder made any response. In forced-choice constant (FC) trials, the Responder also received 1 pellet for responding on the constant reward lever. In forced-choice variable (FV) trials, the Responder received no pellets for responding on the variable reward lever. In free-choice (FR) trials, the Responder chose between constant (1 pellet) and variable reward levers (0 pellets). With their cagemate, rats earned 61.4±2.0 pellets (64.0±2.1% of 96 possible pellets). As Donor in FC trials, rats preferred the variable reward lever, and the Responder responded frequently. In FV trials, Donor preference for the variable reward lever declined as Responder lever responses decreased. In FR trials, rats alternated responding on variable and constant reward levers as Donor and Responder, respectively. When paired with a new partner, there was no effect on Donor responses, but responses by the Responder decreased in the FV block. Similar effects were observed when paired with a maximally-cooperative stooge. Importantly, rats did not adjust their behavior as Donor to receive more pellets. Results suggest that unrelated male rats will work on behalf of a partner, and that their behavior is sensitive to familiarity, and to cooperative responses by their partner.
虽然先前的研究已经证明雌性挪威大鼠存在直接和普遍的互惠行为[26],但本研究确定了无亲缘关系的雄性实验大鼠在重复序贯博弈中是否会代表伙伴做出反应。成对的大鼠在操作箱中为获得食物奖励而工作,在连续试验中,参与者轮流充当捐赠者和响应者。在每次试验中,捐赠者在可变奖励杠杆和固定奖励杠杆之间进行选择,固定奖励杠杆提供1颗食丸,可变奖励杠杆触发响应者杠杆的插入;当响应者做出任何反应时,捐赠者会收到2颗食丸。在强制选择固定(FC)试验中,响应者在固定奖励杠杆上做出反应也会收到1颗食丸。在强制选择可变(FV)试验中,响应者在可变奖励杠杆上做出反应不会收到食丸。在自由选择(FR)试验中,响应者在固定(1颗食丸)和可变奖励杠杆(0颗食丸)之间进行选择。与同笼伙伴一起时,大鼠获得了61.4±2.0颗食丸(占96颗可能食丸的64.0±2.1%)。在FC试验中作为捐赠者时,大鼠更喜欢可变奖励杠杆,并且响应者频繁做出反应。在FV试验中,随着响应者杠杆反应的减少,捐赠者对可变奖励杠杆的偏好下降。在FR试验中,大鼠分别作为捐赠者和响应者时,在可变和固定奖励杠杆上交替做出反应。当与新伙伴配对时,对捐赠者的反应没有影响,但在FV组中响应者的反应减少。当与最大合作的傀儡配对时也观察到了类似的效果。重要的是,大鼠作为捐赠者时不会调整自己的行为以获得更多食丸。结果表明,无亲缘关系的雄性大鼠会代表伙伴工作,并且它们的行为对熟悉程度以及伙伴的合作反应敏感。