Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2420-2428. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5831-5. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) partial nephrectomy (MIPN) for large renal masses.
A systematic literature review was performed up to September 2016 using multiple search engines to identify studies comparing MIPN for tumors larger than 4 cm (>cT1a) with MIPN for tumors smaller than 4 cm (cT1a). The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria were used for article selection. Baseline demographics and surgical, functional, and oncological parameters were extracted from the included studies whenever available. An overall analysis including all studies was performed, then sensitivity analyses were performed for studies on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) only, and, finally, for studies on robotic PN only.
Overall, 13 case-control studies comparing the outcomes of PN in tumors <4 cm (n = 4441) with those of PN for tumors >4 cm (n = 1024) were included. Warm ischemia time was shorter for the <4 cm group [weighted mean difference (WMD) 3.75 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.4 to -0.7; p = 0.01] and the odds of perioperative complications was lower [odds ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% CI 0.5-0.8; p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (WMD 4.2 ml/min; 95% CI 0.45-8.97; p = 0.08), as well as onset of postoperative chronic kidney disease (risk ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.48-1.04; p = 0.08). In addition, no difference was found in the likelihood of positive surgical margins (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.43-1.28; p = 0.29).
MIPN represents a viable treatment option for renal masses larger than 4 cm (higher than cT1a) as it offers good functional outcomes, without increased risk of positive surgical margins. An increased rate of complications should be taken into account when approaching these tumors.
本研究旨在评估微创(腹腔镜和机器人)部分肾切除术(MIPN)治疗大肾脏肿瘤的结果。
截至 2016 年 9 月,使用多个搜索引擎进行了系统的文献综述,以确定比较肿瘤大于 4cm(>cT1a)的 MIPN 与肿瘤小于 4cm(cT1a)的 MIPN 的研究。采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准进行文章选择。只要有可能,就从纳入的研究中提取基线人口统计学和手术、功能和肿瘤学参数。对所有研究进行了总体分析,然后对仅进行腹腔镜部分肾切除术(PN)的研究进行了敏感性分析,最后对仅进行机器人 PN 的研究进行了敏感性分析。
总体而言,纳入了 13 项比较肿瘤<4cm(n=4441)的 PN 与肿瘤>4cm(n=1024)的 PN 结果的病例对照研究。<4cm 组的热缺血时间更短[加权均数差(WMD)3.75min;95%置信区间(CI)-6.4 至-0.7;p=0.01],围手术期并发症的可能性较低[比值比(OR)0.62;95%CI 0.5-0.8;p<0.001]。术后估算肾小球滤过率(WMD 4.2ml/min;95%CI 0.45-8.97;p=0.08)和术后慢性肾脏病发病(风险比 0.71;95%CI 0.48-1.04;p=0.08)差异均无统计学意义。此外,在切缘阳性的可能性方面也未发现差异(OR 0.74;95%CI 0.43-1.28;p=0.29)。
MIPN 是治疗大于 4cm(高于 cT1a)的肾肿瘤的可行治疗选择,因为它可以提供良好的功能结果,而不会增加切缘阳性的风险。在处理这些肿瘤时,应考虑到并发症发生率增加的可能性。