• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视警觉中的社会促进作用:一次成功与一次失败。

Examining social facilitation in vigilance: a hit and a miss.

作者信息

Claypoole Victoria Lynne, Szalma James L

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Central Florida , Orlando , FL , USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2017 Nov;60(11):1485-1499. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1308563. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2017.1308563
PMID:28303759
Abstract

Vigilance is the ability of an observer to maintain attention for extended periods of time; however, performance tends to decline with time on watch, a pattern referred to as the vigilance decrement. Previous research has focused on factors that attenuate the decrement; however, one factor rarely studied is the effect of social facilitation. The purpose for the present investigation was to determine how different types of social presence affected the performance, workload and stress of vigilance. It was hypothesised that the presence of a supervisory figure would increase overall performance, but may occur at the cost of increased workload and stress. Results indicated that the per cent of false alarm and response times decreased in the presence of a supervisory figure. Using social facilitation in vigilance tasks may thus have positive, as well as, negative effects depending on the dependent measure of interest and the role of the observer. Practitioner Summary: Social facilitation has rarely been examined in the context of vigilance, even though it may improve performance. Vigilance task performance was examined under social presence. The results of the present study indicated that false alarms and response times decreased in the social presence of a supervisory figure, thus improving performance.

摘要

警觉是观察者长时间保持注意力的能力;然而,随着值班时间的推移,表现往往会下降,这种模式被称为警觉性下降。以往的研究集中在减轻这种下降的因素上;然而,一个很少被研究的因素是社会促进的影响。本研究的目的是确定不同类型的社会存在如何影响警觉的表现、工作量和压力。研究假设是,监督者的存在会提高整体表现,但可能以增加工作量和压力为代价。结果表明,在有监督者在场的情况下,误报百分比和反应时间会降低。因此,在警觉任务中使用社会促进可能会根据感兴趣的相关指标和观察者的角色产生积极和消极的影响。从业者总结:尽管社会促进可能会提高表现,但在警觉的背景下很少被研究。在有社会存在的情况下对警觉任务表现进行了研究。本研究结果表明,在有监督者在场的社会环境中,误报和反应时间会减少,从而提高表现。

相似文献

1
Examining social facilitation in vigilance: a hit and a miss.审视警觉中的社会促进作用:一次成功与一次失败。
Ergonomics. 2017 Nov;60(11):1485-1499. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1308563. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
2
Independent Coactors May Improve Performance and Lower Workload: Viewing Vigilance Under Social Facilitation.独立合作可能会提高绩效和降低工作量:从社会促进的角度看警戒。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):822-832. doi: 10.1177/0018720818769268. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
Evaluative social presence can improve vigilance performance, but vigilance is still hard work and is stressful.评价性社会存在感可以提高警觉性表现,但警觉性仍然是一项艰苦的工作,并且会带来压力。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):616-627. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000635. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.听觉和视觉监测任务中的持续注意力:关于给予休息时段或外部振动触觉信号的评估
Hum Factors. 2015 Dec;57(8):1403-16. doi: 10.1177/0018720815598433. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
5
Workload and stress in vigilance: the impact of display format and task type.警戒任务中的工作量与压力:显示格式和任务类型的影响
Am J Psychol. 2011 Winter;124(4):441-54. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.4.0441.
6
Effects of state motivation in overload and underload vigilance task scenarios.状态动机在超负荷和低负荷警觉任务场景中的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 24.
7
Use of EEG workload indices for diagnostic monitoring of vigilance decrement.利用 EEG 工作负荷指数对警觉性降低进行诊断监测。
Hum Factors. 2014 Sep;56(6):1136-49. doi: 10.1177/0018720814526617.
8
The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness.警觉性下降反映的是刻意注意力的局限,而非无意识状态。
Hum Factors. 2003 Fall;45(3):349-59. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.3.349.27253.
9
Viewing the workload of vigilance through the lenses of the NASA-TLX and the MRQ.从 NASA-TLX 和 MRQ 的角度来看待警觉的工作量。
Hum Factors. 2013 Dec;55(6):1044-63. doi: 10.1177/0018720813484498.
10
The effects of self-control on cognitive resource allocation during sustained attention: a transcranial Doppler investigation.持续注意期间自我控制对认知资源分配的影响:经颅多普勒研究
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jul;233(7):2215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4291-z. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Better together? Social distance affects joint probability discounting.更紧密的关系?社交距离会影响共同概率折扣。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1513-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01290-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance.同伴在场对眼动和注意力表现的影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jan 8;13:280. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00280. eCollection 2019.