• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的初级保健数据的 COPD 预测模型的外部验证:巢式病例对照研究。

External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study.

机构信息

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK.

School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44702. doi: 10.1038/srep44702.

DOI:10.1038/srep44702
PMID:28304375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5356333/
Abstract

Emerging models for predicting risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) require external validation in order to assess their clinical value. We validated a previous model for predicting new onset COPD in a different database. We randomly drew 38,597 case-control pairs (total N = 77,194) of individuals aged ≥35 years and matched for sex, age, and general practice from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. We assessed accuracy of the model to discriminate between COPD cases and non-cases by calculating area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for the prediction scores. Analogous to the development model, ever smoking (OR 6.70; 95%CI 6.41-6.99), prior asthma (OR 6.43; 95%CI 5.85-7.07), and higher socioeconomic deprivation (OR 2.90; 95%CI 2.72-3.09 for highest vs. lowest quintile) increased the risk of COPD. The validated prediction scores ranged from 0-5.71 (ROC 0.66; 95%CI 0.65-0.66) for males and 0-5.95 (ROC 0.71; 95%CI 0.70-0.71) for females. We have confirmed that smoking, prior asthma, and socioeconomic deprivation are key risk factors for new onset COPD. Our model seems externally valid at identifying patients at risk of developing COPD. An impact assessment now needs to be undertaken to assess whether this prediction model can be applied in clinical care settings.

摘要

预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)风险的新兴模型需要在外部进行验证,以评估其临床价值。我们在另一个数据库中验证了先前预测新发 COPD 的模型。我们从英国临床实践研究数据链数据库中随机抽取了 38597 对年龄≥35 岁的病例对照(总 N=77194),并按性别、年龄和全科医生进行匹配。我们通过计算预测评分的接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积来评估模型区分 COPD 病例和非病例的准确性。与开发模型类似,吸烟史(OR 6.70;95%CI 6.41-6.99)、既往哮喘(OR 6.43;95%CI 5.85-7.07)和更高的社会经济剥夺(OR 2.90;95%CI 2.72-3.09 对于最高五分位数与最低五分位数相比)增加了 COPD 的风险。验证后的预测评分范围为男性 0-5.71(ROC 0.66;95%CI 0.65-0.66),女性 0-5.95(ROC 0.71;95%CI 0.70-0.71)。我们已经证实,吸烟、既往哮喘和社会经济剥夺是新发 COPD 的关键危险因素。我们的模型似乎在外在有效性方面可以识别出有发展为 COPD 风险的患者。现在需要进行影响评估,以评估该预测模型是否可以应用于临床护理环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665b/5356333/af257216203d/srep44702-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665b/5356333/af257216203d/srep44702-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665b/5356333/af257216203d/srep44702-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study.基于人群的初级保健数据的 COPD 预测模型的外部验证:巢式病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44702. doi: 10.1038/srep44702.
2
External validation of the PUMA COPD diagnostic questionnaire in a general practice sample and the PLATINO study population.在一般实践样本和 PLATINO 研究人群中对 PUMA COPD 诊断问卷进行外部验证。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Aug 26;14:1901-1911. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S206250. eCollection 2019.
3
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model to Identify Individuals Likely to Have Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using an Administrative Claims Database.利用行政索赔数据库开发和验证一种预测模型,以识别可能患有未确诊的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的个体。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1149-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1149.
4
Predicting COPD 1-year mortality using prognostic predictors routinely measured in primary care.使用初级保健中常规测量的预后预测因子预测 COPD1 年死亡率。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 5;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1310-0.
5
Development and validation of a model to predict the 10-year risk of general practitioner-recorded COPD.开发和验证一种预测全科医生记录的 COPD 10 年风险的模型。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 May 20;24:14011. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.11.
6
External Validation Of The Updated ADO Score In COPD Patients From The Birmingham COPD Cohort.来自伯明翰慢性阻塞性肺疾病队列研究中慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者更新版ADO评分的外部验证
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Oct 24;14:2395-2407. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S212381. eCollection 2019.
7
Discriminative Accuracy of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Instruments in 3 Low- and Middle-Income Country Settings.在 3 个中低收入国家环境下,慢性阻塞性肺疾病筛查工具的鉴别准确性。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 11;327(2):151-160. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23065.
8
What happens between first symptoms and first acute exacerbation of COPD - observational study of routine data and patient survey.COPD 首次症状与首次急性加重之间的情况 - 常规数据和患者调查的观察性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(43):1-80. doi: 10.3310/CGTR6370.
9
Predicting fracture risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a UK-based population-based cohort study.预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的骨折风险:一项基于英国人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e024951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024951.
10
Discriminative Accuracy of the CAPTURE Tool for Identifying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in US Primary Care Settings.用于识别美国初级保健环境中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的 CAPTURE 工具的判别准确性。
JAMA. 2023 Feb 14;329(6):490-501. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0128.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding resource utilization and mortality in COPD to support policy making: A microsimulation study.了解 COPD 中的资源利用和死亡率以支持政策制定:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0236559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236559. eCollection 2020.
2
Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we?慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的个体化医学:我们在哪里?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jul 9;14:1465-1484. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S175706. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The NHS Health Check programme: implementation in east London 2009-2011.国民保健服务健康检查计划:2009 - 2011年在伦敦东部的实施情况
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e007578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007578.
2
Are clinical risk scores for COPD useful?慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床风险评分有用吗?
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Apr 1;2(1):e000072. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000072. eCollection 2015.
3
Predicting risk of COPD in primary care: development and validation of a clinical risk score.在初级保健中预测 COPD 风险:临床风险评分的制定和验证。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Mar 27;2(1):e000060. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000060. eCollection 2015.
4
External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination.新的风险预测模型的外部验证很少,且显示出较差的预后判别能力。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
5
Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource.以普通实践研究数据库为例,简述英国初级保健数据资源的效用和使用方面的最新进展。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;3(2):89-99. doi: 10.1177/2042098611435911.
6
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD-GOLD).慢性阻塞性肺疾病记录在临床实践研究数据链(CPRD-GOLD)中的验证。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005540.
7
Development and validation of a model to predict the 10-year risk of general practitioner-recorded COPD.开发和验证一种预测全科医生记录的 COPD 10 年风险的模型。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 May 20;24:14011. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.11.
8
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
9
Developing an algorithm to identify people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) using administrative data.开发一种使用行政数据识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 22;12:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-38.
10
Lifetime risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a longitudinal population study.患慢性阻塞性肺疾病的终生风险:一项纵向人群研究。
Lancet. 2011 Sep 10;378(9795):991-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60990-2.