• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健中预测 COPD 风险:临床风险评分的制定和验证。

Predicting risk of COPD in primary care: development and validation of a clinical risk score.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics , School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Mar 27;2(1):e000060. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000060. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000060
PMID:25852945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4379885/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a clinical risk score to identify patients at risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using clinical factors routinely recorded in primary care.

DESIGN

Case-control study of patients containing one incident COPD case to two controls matched on age, sex and general practice. Candidate risk factors were included in a conditional logistic regression model to produce a clinical score. Accuracy of the score was estimated on a separate external validation sample derived from 20 purposively selected practices.

SETTING

UK general practices enrolled in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1 January 2000 to 31 March 2006).

PARTICIPANTS

Development sample included 340 practices containing 15 159 newly diagnosed COPD cases and 28 296 controls (mean age 70 years, 52% male). Validation sample included 2259 cases and 4196 controls (mean age 70 years, 50% male).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (c statistic), sensitivity and specificity in the validation practices.

RESULTS

The model included four variables including smoking status, history of asthma, and lower respiratory tract infections and prescription of salbutamol in the previous 3 years. It had a high average c statistic of 0.85 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.86) and yielded a sensitivity of 63.2% (95% CI 63.1 to 63.3) and specificity 87.4% (95% CI 87.3 to 87.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors associated with COPD and routinely recorded in primary care have been used to develop and externally validate a new COPD risk score. This could be used to target patients for case finding.

摘要

目的

利用初级保健中常规记录的临床因素,开发和验证一种临床风险评分,以识别患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者。

设计

对包含 1 例新发 COPD 病例和 2 例年龄、性别和全科医生匹配对照的患者进行病例对照研究。候选风险因素被纳入条件逻辑回归模型,以产生临床评分。在来自 20 个有目的选择的实践的单独外部验证样本中估计评分的准确性。

设置

英国普通实践纳入临床实践研究数据链接(2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 3 月 31 日)。

参与者

开发样本包括 340 个包含 15159 例新诊断 COPD 病例和 28296 例对照的实践(平均年龄 70 岁,52%为男性)。验证样本包括 2259 例病例和 4196 例对照(平均年龄 70 岁,50%为男性)。

主要观察结果

验证实践中的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(c 统计量)、敏感性和特异性。

结果

该模型包括四个变量,包括吸烟状况、哮喘病史以及前 3 年内下呼吸道感染和沙丁胺醇处方情况。它具有较高的平均 c 统计量 0.85(95%CI 0.83 至 0.86),并产生 63.2%(95%CI 63.1 至 63.3)的敏感性和 87.4%(95%CI 87.3 至 87.5)的特异性。

结论

与 COPD 相关并在初级保健中常规记录的危险因素已被用于开发和外部验证新的 COPD 风险评分。这可用于针对患者进行病例发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/952adae8bcaf/bmjresp2014000060f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/ef790977c66c/bmjresp2014000060f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/f8b624c93af1/bmjresp2014000060f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/952adae8bcaf/bmjresp2014000060f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/ef790977c66c/bmjresp2014000060f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/f8b624c93af1/bmjresp2014000060f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fad/4379885/952adae8bcaf/bmjresp2014000060f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting risk of COPD in primary care: development and validation of a clinical risk score.在初级保健中预测 COPD 风险:临床风险评分的制定和验证。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Mar 27;2(1):e000060. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000060. eCollection 2015.
2
3
Predicting risk of undiagnosed COPD: development and validation of the TargetCOPD score.预测未诊断 COPD 风险:TargetCOPD 评分的制定和验证。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Jun 22;49(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02191-2016. Print 2017 Jun.
4
Predicting risk of emergency admission to hospital using primary care data: derivation and validation of QAdmissions score.利用初级保健数据预测急诊住院风险:QAdmissions 评分的推导和验证。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 19;3(8):e003482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003482.
5
Predicting severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations using quantitative CT: a retrospective model development and external validation study.利用定量 CT 预测严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化:一项回顾性模型开发和外部验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Feb;5(2):e83-e92. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00232-1.
6
Predicting COPD 1-year mortality using prognostic predictors routinely measured in primary care.使用初级保健中常规测量的预后预测因子预测 COPD1 年死亡率。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 5;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1310-0.
7
External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study.基于人群的初级保健数据的 COPD 预测模型的外部验证:巢式病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44702. doi: 10.1038/srep44702.
8
External validation of the PUMA COPD diagnostic questionnaire in a general practice sample and the PLATINO study population.在一般实践样本和 PLATINO 研究人群中对 PUMA COPD 诊断问卷进行外部验证。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Aug 26;14:1901-1911. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S206250. eCollection 2019.
9
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model to Identify Individuals Likely to Have Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using an Administrative Claims Database.利用行政索赔数据库开发和验证一种预测模型,以识别可能患有未确诊的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的个体。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1149-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1149.
10
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人新诊断慢性淋巴细胞白血病的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;7(7):CD012022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012022.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Existing Evidence to Potentially Develop a Machine Learning Diagnostic Algorithm for Cough in Primary Care Settings: Scoping Review.识别现有证据,以潜在开发用于初级保健环境中咳嗽的机器学习诊断算法:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 14;25:e46929. doi: 10.2196/46929.
2
Validation of a Cox prognostic model for tooth autotransplantation.验证 Cox 预后模型在自体牙移植中的应用。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Dec;9(6):969-982. doi: 10.1002/cre2.819. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Questionnaires and risk scores: how to transform research projects into practical tools.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD-GOLD).慢性阻塞性肺疾病记录在临床实践研究数据链(CPRD-GOLD)中的验证。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005540.
2
Development and validation of a model to predict the 10-year risk of general practitioner-recorded COPD.开发和验证一种预测全科医生记录的 COPD 10 年风险的模型。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 May 20;24:14011. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.11.
3
Opportunities to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in routine care in the UK: a retrospective study of a clinical cohort.
调查问卷与风险评分:如何将研究项目转化为实用工具。
J Bras Pneumol. 2023 Nov 17;49(5):e20230302. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230302.
4
Current Progress of COPD Early Detection: Key Points and Novel Strategies.COPD 早期检测的研究进展:要点与新策略。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Jul 19;18:1511-1524. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S413969. eCollection 2023.
5
Development and validation of the EHS-COPD model to predict sex-specific risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in older Chinese adults: Hong Kong's Elderly Health Service Cohort.用于预测中国老年成年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)性别特异性风险的EHS-COPD模型的开发与验证:香港老年健康服务队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(1):4. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3270.
6
The stability of the ADO score among UK COPD patients from The Health Improvement Network.来自健康改善网络的英国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中ADO评分的稳定性。
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Feb 10;6(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00196-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
External validation of a COPD prediction model using population-based primary care data: a nested case-control study.基于人群的初级保健数据的 COPD 预测模型的外部验证:巢式病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44702. doi: 10.1038/srep44702.
8
Are clinical risk scores for COPD useful?慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床风险评分有用吗?
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Apr 1;2(1):e000072. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000072. eCollection 2015.
在英国常规护理中诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病的机会:一项临床队列的回顾性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Apr;2(4):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70008-6. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
4
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
5
Developing an algorithm to identify people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) using administrative data.开发一种使用行政数据识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的算法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 22;12:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-38.
6
Risk prediction measures for case-cohort and nested case-control designs: an application to cardiovascular disease.病例-队列和巢式病例对照设计的风险预测指标:在心血管疾病中的应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Apr 1;175(7):715-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr374. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Simplified COPD screening: validation of the PiKo-6® in primary care.简化慢性阻塞性肺疾病筛查:PiKo-6®在初级保健中的验证
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Jun;20(2):190-8, 2 p following 198. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00040.
8
Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.随机效应荟萃分析的解读
BMJ. 2011 Feb 10;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549.
9
Can outpatient pharmacy data identify persons with undiagnosed COPD?门急诊药房数据能否识别出未被诊断的 COPD 患者?
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jul;16(7):505-12.
10
Case finding for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a model for optimising a targeted approach.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的病例发现:优化靶向方法的模型。
Thorax. 2010 Jun;65(6):492-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.129395.