Berg Åke
Department of Wildlife Ecology, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7002, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Oecologia. 1996 Aug;107(3):343-346. doi: 10.1007/BF00328450.
Predation rates on artificial wader nests, solitary curlew (Numenius arquata) and lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) nests and lapwing nests in colonies were studied on a farmland site in central Sweden. Predation rates were highest on artificial wader nests, intermediate on solitary curlew and lapwing nests and lowest on lapwing nests in colonies, probably because of active defence of adults at real nests and/or because of selection of nest sites with lower predation risk by breeding birds. A comparison of nests close to (≤50 m) and far away from (≥200 m) forest edges revealed no increased predation risk close to edges for any of the studied nest types. Predation risk changed during the season for artificial nests (highest in the middle of May), while predation rates on lapwing and curlew nests were more stable. Artificial nests seem to be inappropriate for measuring actual predation rates and temporal differences in predation rates on real nests, but they might be suitable for use as an index of spatial differences.
在瑞典中部的一个农田地点,研究了对人工涉禽巢、单独的杓鹬(Numenius arquata)巢、田凫(Vanellus vanellus)巢以及群体中的田凫巢的捕食率。人工涉禽巢的捕食率最高,单独的杓鹬和田凫巢的捕食率居中,群体中的田凫巢捕食率最低,这可能是因为真实巢穴中的成年个体进行了积极防御,和/或因为繁殖鸟类选择了捕食风险较低的巢址。对靠近(≤50米)和远离(≥200米)森林边缘的巢穴进行比较发现,对于任何一种研究的巢类型,靠近边缘处的捕食风险都没有增加。人工巢的捕食风险在季节中发生变化(5月中旬最高),而田凫和杓鹬巢的捕食率则更为稳定。人工巢似乎不适用于测量真实巢穴的实际捕食率和捕食率的时间差异,但它们可能适合用作空间差异的指标。