Suppr超能文献

对农田中人工建造的、单个及聚集的涉禽巢穴的捕食行为。

Predation on artificial, solitary and aggregated wader nests on farmland.

作者信息

Berg Åke

机构信息

Department of Wildlife Ecology, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7002, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1996 Aug;107(3):343-346. doi: 10.1007/BF00328450.

Abstract

Predation rates on artificial wader nests, solitary curlew (Numenius arquata) and lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) nests and lapwing nests in colonies were studied on a farmland site in central Sweden. Predation rates were highest on artificial wader nests, intermediate on solitary curlew and lapwing nests and lowest on lapwing nests in colonies, probably because of active defence of adults at real nests and/or because of selection of nest sites with lower predation risk by breeding birds. A comparison of nests close to (≤50 m) and far away from (≥200 m) forest edges revealed no increased predation risk close to edges for any of the studied nest types. Predation risk changed during the season for artificial nests (highest in the middle of May), while predation rates on lapwing and curlew nests were more stable. Artificial nests seem to be inappropriate for measuring actual predation rates and temporal differences in predation rates on real nests, but they might be suitable for use as an index of spatial differences.

摘要

在瑞典中部的一个农田地点,研究了对人工涉禽巢、单独的杓鹬(Numenius arquata)巢、田凫(Vanellus vanellus)巢以及群体中的田凫巢的捕食率。人工涉禽巢的捕食率最高,单独的杓鹬和田凫巢的捕食率居中,群体中的田凫巢捕食率最低,这可能是因为真实巢穴中的成年个体进行了积极防御,和/或因为繁殖鸟类选择了捕食风险较低的巢址。对靠近(≤50米)和远离(≥200米)森林边缘的巢穴进行比较发现,对于任何一种研究的巢类型,靠近边缘处的捕食风险都没有增加。人工巢的捕食风险在季节中发生变化(5月中旬最高),而田凫和杓鹬巢的捕食率则更为稳定。人工巢似乎不适用于测量真实巢穴的实际捕食率和捕食率的时间差异,但它们可能适合用作空间差异的指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验