Suppr超能文献

鱼类捕食和海藻竞争对珊瑚生存与生长的影响。

Effects of fish predation and seaweed competition on the survival and growth of corals.

作者信息

Miller Margaret W, Hay Mark E

机构信息

National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75 Vivginia Beach Dr. Miami, FL 33149, USA, e-mail:

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, 3431 Arendell St., Morehead City, NC 28557, USA, , , , , , US.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1998 Jan;113(2):231-238. doi: 10.1007/s004420050373.

Abstract

On Caribbean coral reefs, high rates of grazing by herbivorous fishes are thought to benefit corals because fishes consume competing seaweeds. We conducted field experiments in the Florida Keys, USA, to examine the effects of grazing fishes on coral/seaweed competition. Initially, fragments of Porites divaracata from an inshore habitat were transplanted into full-cage, half-cage, and no-cage treatments on a fore-reef. Within 48 h, 56% of the unprotected corals in half-cage and no-cage treatments (62 of 111) were completely consumed. Stoplight parrotfish (Sparisoma viride) were the major coral predators, with redband parrotfish (S. aurofrenatum) also commonly attacking this coral. Next, we transplanted fragments of P. porites collected from the fore-reef habitat where our caging experiments were being conducted into the three cage treatments, half in the presence of transplanted seaweeds, and half onto initially clean substrates. The corals were allowed to grow in these conditions, with concurrent development of competing seaweeds, for 14 weeks. Although seaweed cover and biomass were both significantly greater in the full-cage treatment, coral growth did not differ significantly between cage treatments even though corals placed with pre-planted seaweeds grew significantly less than corals placed on initially clean substrate. This surprising result occurred because parrotfishes not only grazed algae from accessible treatments, but also fed directly on our coral transplants. Parrotfish feeding scars were significantly more abundant on P. porites from the half and no-cage treatments than on corals in the full cages. On this Florida reef, direct fish predation on some coral species (P. divaracata) can exclude them from fore-reef areas, as has previously been shown for certain seaweeds and sponges. For other corals that live on the fore-reef (P. porites), the benefits of fishes removing seaweeds can be counterbalanced by the detrimental effects of fishes directly consuming corals.

摘要

在加勒比海的珊瑚礁上,食草鱼类的高啃食率被认为对珊瑚有益,因为鱼类会吃掉与之竞争的海藻。我们在美国佛罗里达群岛进行了实地实验,以研究啃食鱼类对珊瑚/海藻竞争的影响。最初,将来自近岸栖息地的多孔鹿角珊瑚碎片移植到堡礁上的全笼、半笼和无笼处理中。在48小时内,半笼和无笼处理中62%(111个中的62个)未受保护的珊瑚被完全消耗。红绿灯鹦鹉鱼(Sparisoma viride)是主要的珊瑚捕食者,红带鹦鹉鱼(S. aurofrenatum)也经常攻击这种珊瑚。接下来,我们将从正在进行笼养实验的堡礁栖息地采集的多孔鹿角珊瑚碎片移植到三种笼养处理中,一半移植到有移植海藻的地方,一半移植到最初干净的基质上。让珊瑚在这些条件下生长,同时竞争海藻也在生长,持续14周。尽管全笼处理中的海藻覆盖率和生物量都显著更高,但即使放置在预先种植海藻上的珊瑚生长明显少于放置在最初干净基质上的珊瑚,不同笼养处理下的珊瑚生长也没有显著差异。出现这个令人惊讶的结果是因为鹦鹉鱼不仅从可触及的处理中啃食藻类,还直接以我们移植的珊瑚为食。半笼和无笼处理的多孔鹿角珊瑚上的鹦鹉鱼啃食疤痕明显比全笼中的珊瑚上的多。在这片佛罗里达礁上,某些珊瑚物种(多孔鹿角珊瑚)因鱼类的直接捕食而无法在堡礁区域生存,就像之前某些海藻和海绵的情况一样。对于生活在堡礁上的其他珊瑚(多孔鹿角珊瑚)来说,鱼类清除海藻的益处可能会被鱼类直接啃食珊瑚的有害影响所抵消。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验