Menge Bruce A
Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, 97331, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Oecologia. 1979 Aug;41(3):245-272. doi: 10.1007/BF00377430.
The interaction between the sympatric, predaceous seastars, Asterias forbesi and A. vulgaris was studied for five years at eight study sites in northern New England. These species range in depth from the low intertidal to at least 50 m and cooccur over a broad geographic range from central Maine to Cape Hatteras. Both overlap greatly in times and intensity of feeding, body size, diet composition and size of prey consumed. Variations occur in these characteristics from site to site but are always positively correlated.Such similarity along resource dimensions is generally taken to indicate that species compete for resources. In this study, interspecific competition does not seem to occur. Though these seastars are generally smaller than their potential size, and food seems in short supply in some subhabitats, food seems unlimited in other subhabitats. Hence, exploitation competition probably occurs sporadically, not chronically, and is probably a weak selective agent. Laboratory experiments suggest that neither intra- nor interspecific aggression occurs between these seastars. Hence, interference competition seems non-existent in this case.Observations of massive mortality from disease and storms, large variations in seastar density, and a patchy food supply suggests that these populations are generally held below carrying capacity by a kaleidoscopic suite of selective agents. Under such conditions resource shortage would be unlikely to exert strong selective pressure. The high overlaps are thus most likely a reflection of the general absence of pressure to subdivide resources rather than an indication of severe competition.In studies of competition, ecological overlaps should be supplemented by other evidence, including experiments before they can be used as indications of competitive pressure.
在新英格兰北部的八个研究地点,对同域分布的肉食性海星福布斯海星(Asterias forbesi)和普通海星(A. vulgaris)之间的相互作用进行了为期五年的研究。这些物种的分布深度从低潮间带到至少50米,在从缅因州中部到哈特拉斯角的广阔地理范围内共存。它们在摄食时间和强度、体型、饮食组成以及所消耗猎物的大小方面都有很大的重叠。这些特征在不同地点存在差异,但总是呈正相关。沿着资源维度的这种相似性通常被认为表明物种在争夺资源。在这项研究中,种间竞争似乎并未发生。尽管这些海星通常比其潜在体型小,而且在一些亚栖息地食物似乎短缺,但在其他亚栖息地食物似乎是无限的。因此,剥削性竞争可能偶尔发生,而非长期存在,并且可能是一种较弱的选择因素。实验室实验表明,这些海星之间既不存在种内攻击也不存在种间攻击。因此,在这种情况下,干扰性竞争似乎不存在。对疾病和风暴导致的大量死亡、海星密度的巨大变化以及零散的食物供应的观察表明,这些种群通常被一系列千变万化的选择因素控制在承载能力以下。在这种情况下,资源短缺不太可能施加强大的选择压力。因此,高度重叠最有可能反映的是普遍不存在细分资源的压力,而不是激烈竞争的迹象。在竞争研究中,在将生态重叠用作竞争压力的指标之前,应该用其他证据,包括实验来加以补充。