Gazi M I
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Clin Periodontol. 1988 Feb;15(2):106-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1988.tb01002.x.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of rinsing and topical application of sanguinarine on labial surface plaque accumulation, compared with topically applied water, and compared with rinsing with chlorhexidine, while refraining from all oral hygiene measures for 5 days. Color photographs of the disclosed plaque were taken at the end of each phase of treatment and blindly traced using an Apple II micro-computer graphic tablet digitizer. The plaque score for each tooth was calculated by dividing the computer reading of the labial plaque surface area by the total labial surface area of the tooth. Topically applied sanguinarine showed better plaque reduction than mouthrinsing with sanguinarine. There was a significant reduction in plaque accumulation after rinsing with chlorhexidine compared with topically applied sanguinarine, water, and mouthrinsing with sanguinarine. The results of this study indicate that chlorhexidine is a more superior antiplaque agent than sanguinarine. The use of an Apple II micro-computer graphic tablet digitizer provided a valuable method for accurate plaque assessments.
本研究的目的是评估血根碱冲洗及局部应用对唇面菌斑积聚的影响,与局部应用水相比,与洗必泰冲洗相比,同时5天内不采取任何口腔卫生措施。在治疗的每个阶段结束时,拍摄暴露菌斑的彩色照片,并使用苹果II微型计算机图形输入板数字化仪进行盲法追踪。通过将唇面菌斑表面积的计算机读数除以牙齿的总唇面面积,计算每颗牙齿的菌斑评分。局部应用血根碱比用含血根碱的漱口水显示出更好的菌斑减少效果。与局部应用血根碱、水以及用含血根碱的漱口水漱口相比,用洗必泰冲洗后菌斑积聚有显著减少。本研究结果表明,洗必泰是比血根碱更优越的抗菌斑剂。使用苹果II微型计算机图形输入板数字化仪为准确的菌斑评估提供了一种有价值的方法。