Ramberg P, Furuichi Y, Lindhe J, Gaffar A
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Clin Periodontol. 1992 Aug;19(7):509-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb01164.x.
The aim of the present study was to describe a 4-day no oral hygiene model to assess the pattern of de novo plaque formation and to use this model to appraise the potential of some mouthwash preparations to retard or inhibit plaque formation in the human dentition. 10 subjects were recruited for the trial. During a preparatory period, the participants were exposed to repeated professional plaque control and given oral hygiene instruction to eliminate signs of gingivitis. At the end of the preparatory period, each participant received a final professional tooth cleaning and was subsequently told to abstain from mechanical plaque control efforts for the next 4 days. They were asked to rinse twice daily for 60 s with 10 ml varying test solutions. On Day 4, the volunteers were exposed to a new clinical examination and the presence and amount of plaque were examined by the use of the plaque index system (P1I). The participants were subsequently given a professional tooth cleaning and asked to exercise proper self performed plaque control during the next 10 days. A new test period was then initiated. 6 different mouthwash preparations were tested in each subject namely, (1) placebo (a negative control rinse), (2) Veadent mouthrinse, (3) Listerine mouthrinse, (4) 0.06% triclosan + polyvinyl phosphonic acid (PVPA), (5) 0.06% triclosan + phenolic flavor and (6) 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (a positive control rinse). The results from the study revealed that the mean P1I values for individuals, groups of teeth and tooth surfaces provide an adequate but gross overall estimation of the potential of a given mouthrinse to retard/inhibit plaque build up. More detailed information on the effects of the test rinses could be obtained by data describing the % distribution of different P1I score categories; a high frequency of score 0 describes the potential of a mouthrinse to maintain tooth surfaces free from plaque while a low frequency of score 2/3 describes the ability of a treatment to retard/prevent gross plaque formation. The plaque pattern displays finally allowed assessment of the magnitude of plaque prevention, in comparison to the positive and negative controls, that could be achieved by a given compound in various parts and surfaces of the dentition. In this model, all test rinses (i) were significantly more effective than the placebo rinse in retarding de novo plaque build up and (ii) had a minor effects on plaque build up in the maxillary molars and at the approximal surfaces.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本研究的目的是描述一种为期4天的无口腔卫生护理模型,以评估新形成菌斑的模式,并利用该模型评估一些漱口水制剂在人类牙列中延缓或抑制菌斑形成的潜力。10名受试者被招募参加该试验。在准备期,参与者接受反复的专业菌斑控制,并接受口腔卫生指导以消除牙龈炎迹象。在准备期结束时,每位参与者接受了最后一次专业牙齿清洁,随后被告知在接下来的4天内 abstain from机械菌斑控制措施。他们被要求每天用10毫升不同的测试溶液漱口两次,每次60秒。在第4天,志愿者接受新的临床检查,并使用菌斑指数系统(P1I)检查菌斑的存在和数量。随后为参与者进行专业牙齿清洁,并要求他们在接下来的10天内进行适当的自我菌斑控制。然后开始新的测试期。在每个受试者中测试了6种不同的漱口水制剂,即(1)安慰剂(阴性对照漱口水);(2)Veadent漱口水;(3)李施德林漱口水;(4)0.06%三氯生+聚乙烯膦酸(PVPA);(5)0.06%三氯生+酚类香料;(6)0.12%葡萄糖酸洗必泰(阳性对照漱口水)。研究结果表明,个体、牙组和牙面的平均P1I值能对给定漱口水延缓/抑制菌斑积聚的潜力提供充分但粗略的总体估计。通过描述不同P1I评分类别的百分比分布的数据,可以获得关于测试漱口水效果的更详细信息;高频率的0分描述了漱口水保持牙齿表面无菌斑的潜力,而低频率的2/3分描述了一种治疗方法延缓/预防大量菌斑形成的能力。最终的菌斑模式显示允许评估与阳性和阴性对照相比,给定化合物在牙列的各个部位和表面可实现的菌斑预防程度。在这个模型中,所有测试漱口水(i)在延缓新菌斑形成方面比安慰剂漱口水显著更有效,(ii)对上颌磨牙和邻面的菌斑形成有轻微影响。(摘要截断于400字) (注:“abstain from”直译为“戒除;避开”,这里结合语境意译为“不采取”更合适,但因要求不添加解释,所以保留原文)