Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Materials Science, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e622-e626. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12603. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
To evaluate the use of implant-supported overdentures (IOD) and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP) in patients with edentulous mandibles among international prosthodontists.
A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to all clinically active prosthodontists in the International College of Prosthodontists with questions related to implant treatment of the edentulous mandible performed in 2015.
One hundred and sixteen prosthodontists from 33 countries responded to the questionnaire. The vast majority of the responding prosthodontists was faculty or worked in private practice, and the great majority had performed treatment with mandibular implant-supported dental prostheses; however, two thirds of the respondents reported that <20% of the implant patients in their clinic had received treatment related to edentulous mandibles. The majority reported using 2 implants (84%), while 13% used 4 for overdenture retention. There were great variations regarding retention systems used for mandibular IODs; the most common was individual Locator attachments. Cost was considered the most common reason to choose mandibular IOD, There was a wide variation of materials used for mandibular IFDPs. The most common combination included milled titanium frameworks and acrylic resin teeth.
This survey, completed by 116 prosthodontists from 33 countries, showed that implant treatment for edentulous mandibles is common, but there was great variation among the respondents regarding amount of treatments performed, design, and materials used for the implant prostheses.
评估国际口腔修复医师在无牙下颌中使用种植体支持的覆盖义齿(IOD)和种植体支持的固定义齿(IFDP)的情况。
通过电子邮件向国际口腔修复学院所有活跃的口腔修复医师发送问卷,询问 2015 年进行的无牙下颌种植治疗相关问题。
来自 33 个国家的 116 名口腔修复医师对问卷做出了回应。绝大多数回答者是教职员工或在私人诊所工作,绝大多数人进行了下颌种植义齿修复治疗;然而,三分之二的受访者报告说,他们诊所中只有不到 20%的种植患者接受了与无牙下颌相关的治疗。大多数报告使用 2 个种植体(84%),而 13%使用 4 个种植体来保留覆盖义齿。用于下颌 IOD 的固位系统存在很大差异;最常见的是个体Locator 附着体。成本被认为是选择下颌 IOD 的最常见原因,用于下颌 IFDP 的材料也存在很大差异。最常见的组合包括铣削钛框架和丙烯酸树脂牙。
这项由来自 33 个国家的 116 名口腔修复医师完成的调查显示,无牙下颌的种植治疗很常见,但受访者在治疗数量、设计和使用的种植义齿材料方面存在很大差异。