Suppr超能文献

应用于SHRP2碰撞事故的反事实模拟:驾驶员行为模型对智能安全系统安全效益估计的影响。

Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: The effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems.

作者信息

Bärgman Jonas, Boda Christian-Nils, Dozza Marco

机构信息

Vehicle Safety Division, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Lindholmspiren 3, 402 78, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:165-180. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

As the development and deployment of in-vehicle intelligent safety systems (ISS) for crash avoidance and mitigation have rapidly increased in the last decades, the need to evaluate their prospective safety benefits before introduction has never been higher. Counterfactual simulations using relevant mathematical models (for vehicle dynamics, sensors, the environment, ISS algorithms, and models of driver behavior) have been identified as having high potential. However, although most of these models are relatively mature, models of driver behavior in the critical seconds before a crash are still relatively immature. There are also large conceptual differences between different driver models. The objective of this paper is, firstly, to demonstrate the importance of the choice of driver model when counterfactual simulations are used to evaluate two ISS: Forward collision warning (FCW), and autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Secondly, the paper demonstrates how counterfactual simulations can be used to perform sensitivity analyses on parameter settings, both for driver behavior and ISS algorithms. Finally, the paper evaluates the effect of the choice of glance distribution in the driver behavior model on the safety benefit estimation. The paper uses pre-crash kinematics and driver behavior from 34 rear-end crashes from the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study for the demonstrations. The results for FCW show a large difference in the percent of avoided crashes between conceptually different models of driver behavior, while differences were small for conceptually similar models. As expected, the choice of model of driver behavior did not affect AEB benefit much. Based on our results, researchers and others who aim to evaluate ISS with the driver in the loop through counterfactual simulations should be sure to make deliberate and well-grounded choices of driver models: the choice of model matters.

摘要

在过去几十年里,用于避免和减轻碰撞的车载智能安全系统(ISS)的开发和部署迅速增加,因此在引入这些系统之前评估其潜在安全效益的需求从未如此迫切。使用相关数学模型(用于车辆动力学、传感器、环境、ISS算法和驾驶员行为模型)进行的反事实模拟已被认为具有很大潜力。然而,尽管这些模型大多相对成熟,但碰撞前关键几秒的驾驶员行为模型仍相对不成熟。不同的驾驶员模型之间也存在很大的概念差异。本文的目的,首先是证明在使用反事实模拟评估两种ISS(前方碰撞预警(FCW)和自动紧急制动(AEB))时,驾驶员模型选择的重要性。其次,本文展示了如何使用反事实模拟对驾驶员行为和ISS算法的参数设置进行敏感性分析。最后,本文评估了驾驶员行为模型中视线分布选择对安全效益估计的影响。本文使用了SHRP2自然驾驶研究中34起追尾碰撞事故的碰撞前运动学和驾驶员行为进行演示。FCW的结果表明,在概念上不同的驾驶员行为模型之间,避免碰撞的百分比存在很大差异,而在概念上相似的模型之间差异较小。正如预期的那样,驾驶员行为模型的选择对AEB效益影响不大。基于我们的结果,那些旨在通过反事实模拟对包含驾驶员在内的ISS进行评估的研究人员和其他人员应确保对驾驶员模型做出审慎且有充分依据的选择:模型的选择很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验