Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano and IRCCS Maggiore Hospital Foundation, Milano, Italy.
Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, University Hospital Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun;15(6):1180-1190. doi: 10.1111/jth.13678. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
Essentials Between-lab variations of cut-off values in lupus anticoagulant detection are unknown. Cut-off values were calculated in 11 labs each testing plasma from 120 donors with 3 platforms. Major variation was observed even within the same platform. Cut-off values determined in different labs are not interchangeable.
Background Cut-off values for interpretation of lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection are poorly investigated. Aims (i) To assess whether results from healthy donors were normally distributed and (ii) the between-laboratories differences in cut-off values for screening, mixing and LA confirmation when calculated as 99th or 95th centiles, and (iii) to assess their impact on the detection rate for LA. Methods Each of 11 laboratories using one of the three widely used commercial platforms for LA detection was asked to collect plasmas from 120 healthy donors and to perform screening, mixing and LA confirmation with two methods (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT] and dilute Russell viper venom [dRVV]). A common set of LA-positive or LA-negative freeze-dried plasmas was used to assess the LA detection rate. Results were centralized (Milano) for statistical analysis. Results and conclusions (i) Clotting times or ratios for healthy subjects were not normally distributed in the majority of cases. The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined preferably by the non-parametric method based on centiles. (ii) There were relatively large inter-laboratory cut-off variations even within the same platform and the variability was marginally attenuated when results were expressed as ratios (test-to-normal pooled plasma). The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined locally. (iii) There were differences between cut-off values calculated as 99th or 95th centiles that translate into a different LA detection rate (the lower the centile the greater the detection rate). The take-home message is that cut-off values determined as the 95th centile allow a better LA detection rate.
检测狼疮抗凝物(LA)的临界值在不同实验室之间存在变化,目前尚不清楚其具体情况。方法:每个实验室均使用三种广泛应用的商业 LA 检测平台之一,收集 120 名健康供体的血浆,并使用两种方法(活化部分凝血活酶时间 [APTT] 和稀释蝰蛇毒 [dRVV])进行筛查、混合和 LA 确认。使用一组共同的 LA 阳性或 LA 阴性冻干血浆来评估 LA 的检测率。结果:(i)在大多数情况下,健康受试者的凝血时间或比值均呈非正态分布。关键信息是,最好使用基于百分位数的非参数方法来确定临界值。(ii)即使在同一平台内,实验室之间的临界值也存在较大差异,而当结果以比值(测试-正常混合血浆)表示时,这种变异性略有减弱。关键信息是,临界值应在本地确定。(iii)计算 99 百分位或 95 百分位的临界值之间存在差异,这会导致不同的 LA 检测率(百分位越低,检测率越高)。关键信息是,确定 95 百分位的临界值可提高 LA 的检测率。