Matthieu Monica M, Bellamy Jennifer L, Peña Juan B, Scott Lionel D
George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis.
School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago.
Soc Work Res. 2008 Dec;32(4):242-248. doi: 10.1093/swr/32.4.242. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
This article describes the experiences of four social work researchers who pursued an alternative career path immediately following their doctorate in social work by accepting a postdoctoral training fellowship funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). As schools of social work look for creative ways to build research capacity, this article describes the authors' perspectives regarding the considerations to accept postdocs, key elements in their training programs, lessons learned, and outcomes from training. To provide an overview of the funding mechanism and distribution of funds to institutes and centers relevant to social work, data were obtained from databases that list NIH training grants awarded each year. Study results showed a limited amount of variation in fellows' training plans. The majority of training time was spent building skill in manuscript preparation, grant development, and socialization to the NIH culture. Above all other themes, the desire for advanced research training was a critically important factor in accepting a postdoctoral training position. Finally, the outcomes of training may have a profound effect on professional development, yet the long-term trajectory of postdoctoral fellows in academic positions as compared with people without postdoctoral training in social work programs requires further study.
本文介绍了四位社会工作研究者的经历,他们在获得社会工作博士学位后,立即接受了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的博士后培训奖学金,从而走上了一条不同的职业道路。随着社会工作学院寻求创新方法来培养研究能力,本文描述了作者对于接受博士后工作的考量、培训项目的关键要素、经验教训以及培训成果的看法。为了概述资金机制以及向与社会工作相关的机构和中心的资金分配情况,数据来自列出每年授予的NIH培训资助的数据库。研究结果显示,研究员的培训计划差异有限。大部分培训时间用于培养撰写论文、申请资助以及融入NIH文化的技能。在所有其他主题之上,对高级研究培训的渴望是接受博士后培训职位的一个至关重要的因素。最后,培训成果可能会对职业发展产生深远影响,然而,与未在社会工作项目中接受博士后培训的人相比,博士后研究员在学术职位上的长期发展轨迹仍需进一步研究。