Fresco David M, Roy Amy K, Adelsberg Samantha, Seeley Saren, García-Lesy Emmanuel, Liston Conor, Mennin Douglas S
Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State UniversityKent, OH, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of MedicineCleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Psychology, Fordham University Bronx, NY, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 3;11:86. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00086. eCollection 2017.
Despite the success of available medical and psychosocial treatments, a sizable subgroup of individuals with commonly co-occurring disorders, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), fail to make sufficient treatment gains thereby prolonging their deficits in life functioning and satisfaction. Clinically, these patients often display temperamental features reflecting heightened sensitivity to underlying motivational systems related to threat/safety and reward/loss (e.g., somatic anxiety) as well as inordinate negative self-referential processing (e.g., worry, rumination). This profile may reflect disruption in two important neural networks associated with emotional/motivational salience (e.g., salience network) and self-referentiality (e.g., default network, DN). Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) was developed to target this hypothesized profile and its neurobehavioral markers. In the present study, 22 GAD patients (with and without MDD) completed resting state MRI scans before receiving 16 sessions of ERT. To test study these hypotheses, we examined the associations between baseline patterns of intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) of the insula and of hubs within the DN (anterior and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex [MPFC] and posterior cingulate cortex [PCC]) and treatment-related changes in worry, somatic anxiety symptoms and decentering. Results suggest that greater treatment linked reductions in worry were associated with iFC clusters in both the insular and parietal cortices. Greater treatment linked gains in decentering, a metacognitive process that involves the capacity to observe items that arise in the mind with healthy psychological distance that is targeted by ERT, was associated with iFC clusters in the anterior and posterior DN. The current study adds to the growing body of research implicating disruptions in the default and salience networks as promising targets of treatment for GAD with and without co-occurring MDD.
尽管现有医学和心理社会治疗取得了成功,但相当一部分同时患有常见共病(广泛性焦虑症[GAD]和重度抑郁症[MDD])的个体未能从治疗中获得足够改善,从而延长了他们在生活功能和满意度方面的缺陷。临床上,这些患者常表现出气质特征,反映出对与威胁/安全和奖励/损失相关的潜在动机系统(如躯体焦虑)的高度敏感,以及过度的消极自我参照加工(如担忧、沉思)。这种特征可能反映了与情绪/动机显著性(如突显网络)和自我参照性(如默认网络,DN)相关的两个重要神经网络的破坏。情绪调节疗法(ERT)就是针对这种假设的特征及其神经行为标志物而开发的。在本研究中,22名GAD患者(有或无MDD)在接受16次ERT治疗前完成了静息态MRI扫描。为了检验这些假设,我们研究了岛叶以及DN内枢纽(前内侧和背内侧前额叶皮质[MPFC]和后扣带回皮质[PCC])的内在功能连接(iFC)基线模式与担忧、躯体焦虑症状和去中心化方面与治疗相关变化之间的关联。结果表明,与治疗相关的担忧减少幅度越大,与岛叶和顶叶皮质的iFC簇相关。与治疗相关的去中心化改善幅度越大,去中心化是一种元认知过程,涉及以健康的心理距离观察脑海中出现的事物的能力,这是ERT的目标,与前DN和后DN的iFC簇相关。当前研究增加了越来越多的研究,表明默认网络和突显网络的破坏是有或无共病MDD的GAD治疗的有希望的靶点。