• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与单胎妊娠相比,双胎妊娠中先兆子痫的隐匿高发病率。

Hidden high rate of pre-eclampsia in twin compared with singleton pregnancy.

作者信息

Francisco C, Wright D, Benkő Z, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides K H

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):88-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.17470.

DOI:10.1002/uog.17470
PMID:28317207
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the gestational age at delivery in dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, with and without pre-eclampsia (PE), and to determine the relative risk of total and preterm PE compared with that in singleton pregnancies.

METHODS

This was a screening study for PE in twin pregnancies undergoing first-trimester combined screening for aneuploidy and subsequently delivering two phenotypically normal live or stillborn babies at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation. The distribution of gestational age at delivery in DC and MC twins was determined and compared with that in singleton pregnancies from the same population. The relative risk for total and preterm PE in twins compared with singleton pregnancies was determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative incidence of PE in twin and singleton pregnancies, assuming no other cause for delivery, were determined and hazard ratios for twins relative to singletons were obtained from a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The incidence of PE in singletons was 2.3% (2162/93 297), in DC twin pregnancies was 8.1% (145/1789) and in MC twin pregnancies was 6.0% (26/430). Compared with singletons, the relative risk of total PE was 3.5 for DC twins and 2.6 for MC twins. Delivery < 37 weeks' gestation occurred in 5.5% of singletons, 46.5% of DC twins and 91.4% of MC twins. The incidence of preterm PE was 0.6%, 5.5% and 5.8% for singletons, DC twins and MC twins, respectively. Compared with singletons, the relative risk of preterm PE was 8.7 for DC twins and 9.1 for MC twins. In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the hazard ratios for DC and MC twin pregnancies relative to singleton pregnancies were 14 and 23, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative risk of preterm PE in DC and MC twins is similar and substantially higher than in singleton pregnancies. In ongoing twin pregnancies, the high relative risk of PE may merit a higher intensity of monitoring than is routine for singleton pregnancies. © 2017 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

研究双绒毛膜(DC)双胎妊娠和单绒毛膜(MC)双胎妊娠分娩时的孕周,以及有无子痫前期(PE)的情况,并确定双胎妊娠与单胎妊娠相比发生总体子痫前期和早发型子痫前期的相对风险。

方法

这是一项针对双胎妊娠子痫前期的筛查研究,这些双胎妊娠在孕早期接受了非整倍体联合筛查,随后在孕24周及以上分娩出两个表型正常的活产或死产婴儿。确定并比较DC双胎和MC双胎分娩时孕周的分布情况,以及来自同一人群的单胎妊娠的孕周分布情况。确定双胎妊娠与单胎妊娠相比发生总体子痫前期和早发型子痫前期的相对风险。在假设无其他分娩原因的情况下,确定双胎妊娠和单胎妊娠子痫前期累积发病率的Kaplan-Meier估计值,并从Cox比例风险回归模型中获得双胎相对于单胎的风险比。

结果

单胎妊娠子痫前期的发病率为2.3%(2162/93297),DC双胎妊娠为8.1%(145/1789),MC双胎妊娠为6.0%(26/430)。与单胎妊娠相比,DC双胎发生总体子痫前期的相对风险为3.5,MC双胎为2.6。单胎妊娠中孕周<37周分娩的发生率为5.5%,DC双胎为46.5%,MC双胎为91.4%。单胎、DC双胎和MC双胎早发型子痫前期的发病率分别为0.6%、5.5%和5.8%。与单胎妊娠相比,DC双胎发生早发型子痫前期的相对风险为8.7,MC双胎为9.1。在Cox比例风险回归模型中,DC双胎妊娠和MC双胎妊娠相对于单胎妊娠的风险比分别为14和23。

结论

DC双胎和MC双胎发生早发型子痫前期的相对风险相似,且显著高于单胎妊娠。对于正在进行的双胎妊娠,子痫前期的高相对风险可能需要比单胎妊娠常规监测强度更高的监测。©2017作者。《妇产科超声》由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科超声学会出版。

相似文献

1
Hidden high rate of pre-eclampsia in twin compared with singleton pregnancy.与单胎妊娠相比,双胎妊娠中先兆子痫的隐匿高发病率。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):88-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.17470.
2
Competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy by maternal characteristics and medical history.基于母体特征和病史的双胎妊娠子痫前期筛查的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):501-506. doi: 10.1002/uog.17529. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Revised competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy by maternal characteristics and medical history.基于母体特征和病史的双胞胎妊娠子痫前期筛查的校正竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;54(5):617-624. doi: 10.1002/uog.20411. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
4
Twin pregnancy with two live fetuses at 11-13 weeks: effect of one fetal death on pregnancy outcome.11-13 周双胎妊娠且存活两胎儿:一胎死亡对妊娠结局的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):482-488. doi: 10.1002/uog.21925. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Diagnosis of fetal defects in twin pregnancies at routine 11-13-week ultrasound examination.在常规的 11-13 周超声检查中诊断双胎妊娠胎儿缺陷。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):474-481. doi: 10.1002/uog.21938. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort.单绒毛膜和双绒毛膜双胎妊娠的自然病程:一项历史性队列研究。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Jun;9(3):450-5. doi: 10.1375/183242706777591281.
7
Competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy according to maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation.根据 11-13 孕周的母体因素和生物标志物,对双胎妊娠子痫前期进行筛查的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):589-595. doi: 10.1002/uog.17531. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Outcome of twin pregnancy with two live fetuses at 11-13 weeks' gestation.11-13 孕周双活胎妊娠结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;55(1):32-38. doi: 10.1002/uog.21892. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Uterine artery Doppler evaluation in twin pregnancies at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation.孕11⁺⁰至13⁺⁶周双胎妊娠的子宫动脉多普勒评估
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;44(5):557-61. doi: 10.1002/uog.13340. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
10
Early fetal loss in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort.单绒毛膜和双绒毛膜双胎妊娠的早期胎儿丢失:西南泰晤士产科研究协作组(STORK)多胎妊娠队列分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):632-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.12363. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Progress on Ferroptosis Regulation of Female Reproduction.铁死亡对女性生殖调节的研究进展
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s12011-025-04818-4.
2
First- and Second-Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler and Hypertensive Disorders in Twin Pregnancies.双胎妊娠孕早期和孕中期子宫动脉多普勒检查与高血压疾病
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):5563. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155563.
3
Clinical guidance VVOG: Antenatal care for twin pregnancies.临床指南VVOG:双胎妊娠的产前护理
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 Jun 27;27:100414. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100414. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia: A case-control study.埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院双胎妊娠合并先兆子痫的围产期结局:一项病例对照研究。
Public Health Chall. 2022 Nov 14;1(4):e37. doi: 10.1002/puh2.37. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Estimating due date in twin pregnancy by second- and third-trimester ultrasound.通过孕中期和孕晚期超声估计双胎妊娠的预产期
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;66(1):33-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.29258. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
6
The prognostic nutritional index is associated with preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.预后营养指数与双胎妊娠子痫前期相关。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 14;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07669-y.
7
Early prediction of preeclampsia from clinical, multi-omics and laboratory data using random forest model.使用随机森林模型从临床、多组学和实验室数据中对先兆子痫进行早期预测。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 5;25(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07582-4.
8
Comparative study on the factors influencing pre-eclampsia symptoms at different pregnancy stages in Bangladeshi women: urban vs. rural perspectives.孟加拉国女性不同孕期子痫前期症状影响因素的比较研究:城市与农村视角
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07588-y.
9
Twin delivery: does induction of labor make a difference?双胎分娩:引产会有不同吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07939-2.
10
An Unusual and Severe Thyrotoxicosis in a Twin Pregnancy: Fortune Favors the Brave.双胎妊娠中的一种罕见且严重的甲状腺毒症:勇者福至。
Case Rep Endocrinol. 2025 Jan 10;2025:6298137. doi: 10.1155/crie/6298137. eCollection 2025.