UMR 1391 ISPA, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRA, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Sep;23(9):3808-3824. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13691. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
Because the capability of terrestrial ecosystems to fix carbon is constrained by nutrient availability, understanding how nutrients limit plant growth is a key contemporary question. However, what drives nutrient limitations at global scale remains to be clarified. Using global data on plant growth, plant nutritive status, and soil fertility, we investigated to which extent soil parent materials explain nutrient limitations. We found that N limitation was not linked to soil parent materials, but was best explained by climate: ecosystems under harsh (i.e., cold and or dry) climates were more N-limited than ecosystems under more favourable climates. Contrary to N limitation, P limitation was not driven by climate, but by soil parent materials. The influence of soil parent materials was the result of the tight link between actual P pools of soils and physical-chemical properties (acidity, P richness) of soil parent materials. Some other ground-related factors (i.e., soil weathering stage, landform) had a noticeable influence on P limitation, but their role appeared to be relatively smaller than that of geology. The relative importance of N limitation versus P limitation was explained by a combination of climate and soil parent material: at global scale, N limitation became prominent with increasing climatic constraints, but this global trend was modulated at lower scales by the effect of parent materials on P limitation, particularly under climates favourable to biological activity. As compared with soil parent materials, atmospheric deposition had only a weak influence on the global distribution of actual nutrient limitation. Our work advances our understanding of the distribution of nutrient limitation at global scale. In particular, it stresses the need to take soil parent materials into account when investigating plant growth response to environment changes.
由于陆地生态系统固定碳的能力受到养分供应的限制,因此了解养分如何限制植物生长是当前的一个关键问题。然而,全球范围内什么因素驱动着养分限制仍需阐明。本研究利用全球植物生长、植物营养状况和土壤肥力数据,调查了土壤母质在多大程度上解释了养分限制。结果发现,氮限制与土壤母质无关,但与气候密切相关:在恶劣(即寒冷或干旱)气候下的生态系统比在较适宜气候下的生态系统受氮限制更为严重。与氮限制相反,磷限制不受气候驱动,而是受土壤母质驱动。土壤母质的影响是土壤实际磷库与土壤母质理化性质(酸度、磷含量)之间紧密联系的结果。其他一些与地面相关的因素(如土壤风化阶段、地形)对磷限制有显著影响,但它们的作用似乎比地质学的作用要小。氮限制与磷限制的相对重要性由气候和土壤母质共同解释:在全球范围内,随着气候约束的增加,氮限制变得更加突出,但这种全球趋势在较低尺度上受到母质对磷限制影响的调节,特别是在有利于生物活动的气候条件下。与土壤母质相比,大气沉降对实际养分限制的全球分布只有微弱的影响。本研究增进了我们对全球尺度养分限制分布的理解。特别是,它强调在研究植物对环境变化的生长响应时需要考虑土壤母质。