• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Review of State Laws Restricting Local Authority to Impose Alcohol Taxes in the United States.美国限制地方政府征收酒精税权力的州法律综述。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):241-248. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.241.
2
Cost-effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia.澳大利亚容积酒精税的成本效益。
Med J Aust. 2010 Apr 19;192(8):439-43. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03581.x.
3
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
Overview of State Laws Restricting Alcohol Outlet Density in the United States.美国各州限制酒类销售点密度的法规概述。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(4):558-566. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001944. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Comparing alcohol taxation throughout the European Union.比较整个欧盟的酒精税收。
Addiction. 2019 Aug;114(8):1489-1494. doi: 10.1111/add.14631. Epub 2019 May 30.
6
Common state mechanisms regulating tribal tobacco taxation and sales, the USA, 2015.2015年美国部落烟草税收与销售的常见调控机制
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i32-i37. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053079. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
7
Increasing Alcohol Taxes: Analysis of Case Studies From Illinois, Maryland, and Massachusetts.提高酒精税:对伊利诺伊州、马里兰州和马萨诸塞州案例研究的分析
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Sep;78(5):763-770. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.763.
8
The efficiency of a volumetric alcohol tax in Australia.澳大利亚容积酒精税的效率。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jan 1;10(1):37-49. doi: 10.2165/11594850-000000000-00000.
9
Employment impacts of alcohol taxes.酒精税对就业的影响。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105S:S50-S55. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Earmarked Taxes for Mental Health Services in the United States: A Local and State Legal Mapping Study.美国精神卫生服务专项税收:地方和州法律测绘研究。
Milbank Q. 2023 Jun;101(2):457-485. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12643. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
State Preemption Repeal: A Pathway to Broader Smoke-Free Indoor Air Policies in the U.S.州优先废除权:美国更广泛的室内无烟空气政策之路
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jun;68(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.02.019. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
2
An online assessment of pricing for ready-to-drink alcohol products: Implications for risk and policy solutions.即饮酒精产品定价的在线评估:对风险及政策解决方案的启示
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jan;49(1):226-233. doi: 10.1111/acer.15491. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
3
An Association Between State Laws Limiting Local Control and Community Smoke-Free Indoor Air in the United States.美国限制地方控制权的州法律与社区室内无烟空气之间的关联。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241280905. doi: 10.1177/21501319241280905.
4
The association between excise tax structures and the price variability of alcoholic beverages in the United States.美国消费税结构与酒类饮料价格变化的关联。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 27;13(12):e0208509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208509. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
2010 National and State Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption.2010年过量饮酒造成的国家和州成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):e73-e79. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.031. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2
The relationship between alcohol taxes and binge drinking: evaluating new tax measures incorporating multiple tax and beverage types.酒精税与暴饮之间的关系:评估纳入多种税种和饮料类型的新税收措施。
Addiction. 2015 Mar;110(3):441-50. doi: 10.1111/add.12818. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
3
U.S. alcohol affordability and real tax rates, 1950-2011.美国酒精饮料的可负担性和实际税率,1950-2011 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 May;44(5):459-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.007.
4
State pre-emption, local control, and alcohol retail outlet density regulation.州政府先行控制,地方控制和酒精零售点密度调节。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.029.
5
The cost of alcohol and its corresponding taxes in the U.S.: a massive public subsidy of excessive drinking and alcohol industries.美国酒精饮料的成本及其相应税收:对过度饮酒和酒精行业的巨额公共补贴。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):546-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.001.
6
Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review.酒精税和价格政策对发病率和死亡率的影响:系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2270-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.186007. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
7
Increasing alcoholic beverage taxes is recommended to reduce excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.建议提高酒精饮料税以减少过度饮酒及相关危害。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):230-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.002.
8
The effectiveness of tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.税收政策干预措施对于减少过度饮酒和相关危害的有效性。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):217-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.005.
9
Preemption or prevention?: lessons from efforts to control firearms, alcohol, and tobacco.先发制人还是预防?:从控制枪支、酒精和烟草的努力中吸取的教训。
J Public Health Policy. 1998;19(1):36-50.

美国限制地方政府征收酒精税权力的州法律综述。

Review of State Laws Restricting Local Authority to Impose Alcohol Taxes in the United States.

作者信息

Mosher James F, Adler Sabrina S, Pamukcu Aysha M, Treffers Ryan D

机构信息

Alcohol Policy Consultations, Felton, California.

ChangeLab Solutions, Oakland, California.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Mar;78(2):241-248. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.241.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2017.78.241
PMID:28317504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5554105/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Building on the extensive research literature demonstrating that increasing alcohol prices reduces excessive alcohol consumption and related harms, this article presents the results of a 50-state review of local authority to tax alcohol in the United States.

METHOD

Between 2013 and 2015, legal databases and government websites were reviewed to collect and analyze relevant statutes, ordinances, and case law. Results reflect laws in effect as of January 1, 2015.

RESULTS

Nineteen states allow local alcohol taxation, although 15 of those have one or more major restrictions on local authority to tax. The types of major restrictions are (a) restrictions on the type of beverage and alcohol content that can be taxed, (b) caps on local alcohol taxes, (c) restrictions on the type of retailer where taxes can be imposed, (d) restrictions on jurisdictions within the state that can levy taxes, and (e) requirements for how tax revenue can be spent.

CONCLUSIONS

The number and severity of restrictions on local authority to tax alcohol vary across states. Previous research has shown that increases in alcohol taxes can lead to reduced excessive alcohol consumption, which provides public health and economic benefits. Taxes can also provide funds to support local prevention and treatment services. Local alcohol taxes therefore present an important policy opportunity, both in states that restrict local authority and in states where local authority exists but is underused.

摘要

目的

基于大量研究文献表明提高酒精价格可减少过量饮酒及相关危害,本文呈现了对美国50个州地方酒精征税权的审查结果。

方法

在2013年至2015年期间,查阅法律数据库和政府网站以收集和分析相关法规、条例及判例法。结果反映的是截至2015年1月1日生效的法律。

结果

19个州允许地方征收酒精税,不过其中15个州对地方征税权有一项或多项主要限制。主要限制类型包括:(a)对可征税饮料类型和酒精含量的限制;(b)地方酒精税上限;(c)对可征税零售商类型的限制;(d)对该州内可征税辖区的限制;(e)对税收用途的要求。

结论

各州对地方酒精征税权的限制数量和严格程度各不相同。先前研究表明提高酒精税可导致过量饮酒减少,这带来了公共卫生和经济效益。税收还可为支持地方预防和治疗服务提供资金。因此,无论在限制地方权力的州还是地方权力存在但未充分利用的州,地方酒精税都提供了一个重要的政策机遇。