Othman Mohamed O, Zhang Daniel, Elhanafi Sherif, Eloliby Mohamed, Davis Brian, Guererro Richard, Alvarado Luis, Sanchez Linda, Dwivedi Alok, Zuckerman Marc J
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Am J Med Sci. 2017 Apr;353(4):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
Cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) has been reported to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in Asian population. However, CAC trials in non-Asian population have had conflicting results. Studies in North America have shown an improvement in ADRs with the use of CAC, but it mainly included white and African American patients. Given the lack of prospective studies of CAC in Hispanics, we conducted this randomized controlled trial.
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing CAC with standard colonoscopy (SC) in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Our primary outcome was the ADR. Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate, mean polyp and ADR, advanced ADR (AADR) and detection rates based on polyp morphology and location.
A total of 440 patients were included in the study (88.5% Hispanic). Cecal and terminal ileum intubation rates were similar in both groups (CAC: 97% and 86% versus SC: 99% and 81%, respectively). CAC did not improve ADR in comparison with SC (0.65 versus 0.52; P = 0.079); however, CAC had a higher AADR in comparison with SC (9.9% versus 4.6%; P = 0.049). CAC detected significantly more pedunculated polyps as compared with flat and sessile polyps (P = 0.011). Complication rates were similar in the CAC and SC groups (0.9% versus 0%).
In a predominantly Hispanic population, no difference was seen in the mean ADR with the use of CAC. However, CAC, when compared with SC, resulted in an increased AADR and mean polyp detection rate.
据报道,在亚洲人群中,帽辅助结肠镜检查(CAC)可提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)。然而,在非亚洲人群中进行的CAC试验结果相互矛盾。北美地区的研究表明,使用CAC可提高ADR,但主要纳入的是白人和非裔美国患者。鉴于缺乏针对西班牙裔人群的CAC前瞻性研究,我们开展了这项随机对照试验。
这是一项随机对照试验,比较了接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查的患者中CAC与标准结肠镜检查(SC)的效果。我们的主要结局指标是ADR。次要结局指标包括息肉检出率、平均息肉及ADR、进展期ADR(AADR)以及基于息肉形态和位置的检出率。
本研究共纳入440例患者(88.5%为西班牙裔)。两组的盲肠和回肠末端插管率相似(CAC组分别为97%和86%,SC组分别为99%和81%)。与SC相比,CAC并未提高ADR(分别为0.65和0.52;P = 0.079);然而,与SC相比,CAC的AADR更高(9.9%对4.6%;P = 0.049)。与扁平息肉和无蒂息肉相比,CAC检测出的有蒂息肉明显更多(P = 0.011)。CAC组和SC组的并发症发生率相似(分别为0.9%和0%)。
在以西班牙裔为主的人群中,使用CAC时平均ADR未见差异。然而,与SC相比,CAC导致AADR和平均息肉检出率增加。