• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用帽辅助式结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验。

Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri 64128-2295, USA.

出版信息

Gut. 2012 Mar;61(3):402-8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300187. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300187
PMID:21997547
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) uses a small plastic transparent cap attached to the tip of the colonoscope that can depress and flatten colonic folds and thus improve visualisation of their proximal aspects. The aim of this study was to compare CAC with standard colonoscopy (SC; high-definition white light) for adenoma detection rates.

DESIGN

This is a prospective randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was performed in a tertiary-care Veterans Affairs Medical Center in the USA.

PATIENTS

Subjects undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were randomised to undergo either CAC or SC.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma, the number of adenomas detected per subject, insertion time, caecal intubation rates and complications.

RESULTS

420 subjects were enrolled and included in the study (210 in each group). The proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma was higher with CAC compared to SC (69% vs 56%, p=0.009). CAC also detected a higher number of adenomas per subject (2.3 vs 1.4, p<0.001). The caecal intubation time was shorter with CAC (3.29 min vs 3.98 min, p<0.001). The caecal intubation rates were similar in the two groups (99% vs 98%, p=0.37). There were no complications associated with CAC or SC.

CONCLUSIONS

CAC detected a 13% higher number of subjects with at least one adenoma and 59% higher adenomas per subject. CAC is a safe, effective and practical means to improve adenoma detection rates.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT 01211132.

摘要

目的

帽辅助结肠镜检查(CAC)使用附在结肠镜尖端的小塑料透明帽,可以压平和展平结肠褶皱,从而改善其近端的可视化效果。本研究的目的是比较 CAC 与标准结肠镜检查(SC;高清白光)在腺瘤检出率方面的差异。

设计

这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

地点

该研究在美国一家三级保健退伍军人事务医疗中心进行。

患者

接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查的患者入组。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受 CAC 或 SC。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标为至少有一个腺瘤的患者比例、每个患者检出的腺瘤数量、插入时间、盲肠插管率和并发症。

结果

420 名患者入组并纳入研究(每组 210 名)。与 SC 相比,CAC 组有更多的患者至少有一个腺瘤(69%比 56%,p=0.009)。CAC 还检测到每个患者更多的腺瘤(2.3 比 1.4,p<0.001)。CAC 的盲肠插管时间更短(3.29 分钟比 3.98 分钟,p<0.001)。两组的盲肠插管率相似(99%比 98%,p=0.37)。CAC 或 SC 均无相关并发症。

结论

CAC 检测到至少有一个腺瘤的患者比例增加了 13%,每个患者的腺瘤数量增加了 59%。CAC 是一种安全、有效且实用的方法,可以提高腺瘤检出率。

临床试验注册

NCT 01211132。

相似文献

1
Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.使用帽辅助式结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验。
Gut. 2012 Mar;61(3):402-8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300187. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.圈套辅助结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1426-34. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301327. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
3
Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.根据病变位置和内镜医师培训水平评估帽辅助结肠镜检查的疗效。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 28;21(20):6261-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6261.
4
High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.高清电子染色结肠镜与高清白光结肠镜用于一般风险结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
5
The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.套扎辅助结肠镜检查在息肉检测和盲肠插管中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;107(8):1165-73. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.135. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
6
Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.计算虚拟 chromoendoscopy 在结直肠癌筛查中的疗效:前瞻性、随机、背靠背试验比较富士智能色彩增强与传统结肠镜检查对腺瘤漏诊率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.055. Epub 2010 May 20.
7
Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.帽辅助结肠镜检查与常规结肠镜检查的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;104(1):41-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.56.
8
A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.采用优化退镜技术对标准结肠镜与高清结肠镜检测腺瘤和增生性息肉的比较研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):768-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x.
9
Usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy during colonoscopic EMR: a randomized, controlled trial.圈套辅助式结肠镜检查在结肠镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):869-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
10
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法:联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Narrow Band Imaging versus White Light for the Detection of Sessile Serrated Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.窄带成像与白光用于检测无蒂锯齿状结直肠病变的随机临床试验
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct 27;30(5):368-374. doi: 10.1159/000526606. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Impact of a Time-Related Benchmark on the Adenoma Detection Rate in Surveillance Colonoscopy: A STROBE Statement-Oriented Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.基于时间的基准对监测结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率的影响:一项基于 STROBE 声明的横断面队列研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;34(12):1212-1219. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22883.
3
Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis comparing short long cap-assisted colonoscopy for acute hematochezia.
多中心倾向评分匹配分析比较短帽辅助结肠镜检查与长帽辅助结肠镜检查对急性便血的效果
JGH Open. 2023 Jul 12;7(7):487-496. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12936. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.在内镜黏膜切除术中实现高质量切除。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):338-353. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338.
5
Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold.结肠息肉的黏膜成像:新进展和未来可能的发展方向。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 21;28(47):6632-6661. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632.
6
Detection of colorectal lesions during colonoscopy.结肠镜检查期间大肠病变的检测。
DEN Open. 2021 Nov 2;2(1):e68. doi: 10.1002/deo2.68. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Predictive factors for adenoma detection rates: a video study of endoscopist practices.腺瘤检出率的预测因素:内镜医师操作的视频研究
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Feb;9(2):E216-E223. doi: 10.1055/a-1321-0990. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Number of significant polyps detected per six-minute withdrawal time at colonoscopy (SP6): a new measure of colonoscopy efficiency and quality.结肠镜检查时每6分钟退镜时间检测到的显著息肉数量(SP6):一种衡量结肠镜检查效率和质量的新指标。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 24;11(6):491-493. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101184. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Cap-assisted endoscopy increases ampulla of Vater visualization in high-risk patients.帽辅助内镜检查可增加高危患者壶腹的可视化。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01361-5.
10
Adenoma and Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates of Water Exchange, Endocuff, and Cap Colonoscopy: A Network Meta-Analysis with Pooled Data of Randomized Controlled Trials.水交换、Endocuff 和 Cap 结肠镜腺瘤和高级腺瘤检出率的网状 Meta 分析:基于随机对照试验的汇总数据。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):1175-1188. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06324-0. Epub 2020 May 25.