Hoffmann Diane E, Palumbo Francis B, Ravel Jacques, Rowthorn Virginia, von Rosenvinge Erik
a School of Law , University of Maryland , Baltimore , MD , USA.
b Center for Drugs and Public Policy , University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Gut Microbes. 2017 May 4;8(3):208-213. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1293223. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
The advent of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and the prospect of other types of microbiota transplants (MT), e.g. vaginal, skin, oral and nasal, are challenging regulatory agencies. Although FDA is regulating FMT (as a biologic), there is currently no widely accepted or agreed upon scientific or legal definition of FMT or MT. The authors report on discussions regarding a definition of MT that took place among a working group of stakeholders convened under a National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases grant to address the regulation of MT. In arriving at a definition, the group considered the 1) nature of the material being transplanted; 2) degree of manipulation of the transferred materials prior to implantation; 3) ability to characterize the transplanted product using external techniques; and 4) origin of the stool product (single vs multiple donors).
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)的出现以及其他类型微生物群移植(MT)的前景,如阴道、皮肤、口腔和鼻腔微生物群移植,正在给监管机构带来挑战。尽管美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)正在对FMT(作为一种生物制品)进行监管,但目前对于FMT或MT尚无被广泛接受或认可的科学或法律定义。作者报告了在一项由美国国立过敏与传染病研究所资助召开的利益相关者工作组会议上,就MT定义所进行的讨论,该会议旨在探讨MT的监管问题。在确定定义时,该小组考虑了以下几点:1)被移植物质的性质;2)植入前对转移物质的操作程度;3)使用外部技术表征移植产品的能力;4)粪便产品的来源(单一供体还是多个供体)。