Scouten William T, Mehalick Melissa L, Yoder Elizabeth, McCoy Andrea, Brannock Tracy, Riddle Mark S
1Naval Medical Center Portsmouth,Portsmouth,VirginiaUSA.
2Naval Medical Research Center,Silver Spring,MarylandUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):393-402. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17000218. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Introduction Operational stress describes individual behavior in response to the occupational demands and tempo of a mission. The stress response of military personnel involved in combat and peace-keeping missions has been well-described. The spectrum of effect on medical professionals and support staff providing humanitarian assistance, however, is less well delineated. Research to date concentrates mainly on shore-based humanitarian missions. Problem The goal of the current study was to document the pattern of operational stress, describe factors responsible for it, and the extent to which these factors impact job performance in military and civilian participants of Continuing Promise 2011 (CP11), a ship-based humanitarian medical mission.
This was a retrospective study of Disease Non-Battle Injury (DNBI) data from the medical sick-call clinic and from weekly self-report questionnaires for approximately 900 US military and civilian mission participants aboard the USNS COMFORT (T-AH 20). The incidence rates and job performance impact of reported Operational Stress/Mental Health (OS/MH) issues and predictors (age, rank, occupation, service branch) of OS/MH issues (depression, anxiety) were analyzed over a 22-week deployment period.
Incidence rates of OS/MH complaints from the sick-call clinic were 3.7% (4.5/1,000 persons) and 12.0% (53/1,000 persons) from the self-report questionnaire. The rate of operational stress increased as the mission progressed and fluctuated during the mission according to ship movement. Approximately 57% of the responders reported no impact on job performance. Younger individuals (enlisted ranks E4-6, officer ranks O1-3), especially Air Force service members, those who had spent only one day off ship, and those who were members of specific directorates, reported the highest rates of operational stress.
The overall incidence of OS/MH complaints was low in participants of CP11 but was under-estimated by clinic-based reporting. The OS/MH complaints increased as the mission progressed, were more prevalent in certain groups, and appeared to be related to ship's movement. These findings document the pattern of operational stress in a ship-based medical humanitarian mission and confirm unique ship-based stressors. This information may be used by planners of similar missions to develop mitigation strategies for known stressors and by preventive medicine, behavioral health specialists, and mission leaders to develop sensitive surveillance tools to better detect and manage operational stress while on mission. Scouten WT , Mehalick ML , Yoder E , McCoy A , Brannock T , Riddle MS . The epidemiology of operation stress during Continuing Promise 2011: a humanitarian response and disaster relief mission aboard a US Navy hospital ship. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(4):393-402.
引言 作战压力描述的是个体对任务的职业要求和节奏所做出的行为反应。参与战斗和维和任务的军事人员的应激反应已得到充分描述。然而,对提供人道主义援助的医疗专业人员和支持人员的影响范围却鲜有明确界定。迄今为止的研究主要集中在岸上的人道主义任务。问题 本研究的目的是记录作战压力模式,描述其成因,以及这些因素对“2011持续承诺”(CP11)这一海上人道主义医疗任务中的军事和文职参与者工作表现的影响程度。
这是一项回顾性研究,数据来自医疗伤病员诊疗所的疾病非战斗损伤(DNBI)数据,以及美国海军“舒适”号(T-AH 20)上约900名美军和文职任务参与者的每周自我报告问卷。分析了在为期22周的部署期间报告的作战压力/心理健康(OS/MH)问题的发病率、对工作表现的影响以及OS/MH问题(抑郁、焦虑)的预测因素(年龄、军衔、职业、军种)。
伤病员诊疗所报告的OS/MH投诉发生率为3.7%(4.5/1000人),自我报告问卷的发生率为12.0%(53/1000人)。作战压力发生率随着任务推进而增加,并根据船只移动在任务期间波动。约57%的受访者报告对工作表现没有影响。较年轻的个体(士兵军衔E4 - 6、军官军衔O1 - 3),尤其是空军服役人员、离船仅休息一天的人员以及特定部门的人员,报告的作战压力发生率最高。
CP11参与者中OS/MH投诉的总体发生率较低,但基于诊疗所的报告对此有所低估。OS/MH投诉随着任务推进而增加,在某些群体中更为普遍,且似乎与船只移动有关。这些发现记录了海上医疗人道主义任务中的作战压力模式,并确认了独特的海上压力源。这些信息可供类似任务的规划者用于制定针对已知压力源的缓解策略,也可供预防医学、行为健康专家和任务负责人用于开发敏感的监测工具,以便在执行任务时更好地检测和管理作战压力。斯科滕WT,梅哈利克ML,约德E,麦考伊A,布兰诺克T,里德尔MS。“2011持续承诺”期间作战压力的流行病学:美国海军医院船的一次人道主义应对和救灾任务。院前灾难医学。2017;32(4):393 - 402。