Suppr超能文献

多种共表达配体对体内血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)激活作用的计算分析

A computational analysis of in vivo VEGFR activation by multiple co-expressed ligands.

作者信息

Clegg Lindsay E, Mac Gabhann Feilim

机构信息

Institute for Computational Medicine, Institute for NanoBioTechnology, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Mar 20;13(3):e1005445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005445. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Abstract

The splice isoforms of vascular endothelial growth A (VEGF) each have different affinities for the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the coreceptor NRP1, which leads to distinct vascular phenotypes in model systems expressing only a single VEGF isoform. ECM-immobilized VEGF can bind to and activate VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) directly, with a different pattern of site-specific phosphorylation than diffusible VEGF. To date, the way in which ECM binding alters the distribution of isoforms of VEGF and of the related placental growth factor (PlGF) in the body and resulting angiogenic signaling is not well-understood. Here, we extend our previous validated cell-level computational model of VEGFR2 ligation, intracellular trafficking, and site-specific phosphorylation, which captured differences in signaling by soluble and immobilized VEGF, to a multi-scale whole-body framework. This computational systems pharmacology model captures the ability of the ECM to regulate isoform-specific growth factor distribution distinctly for VEGF and PlGF, and to buffer free VEGF and PlGF levels in tissue. We show that binding of immobilized growth factor to VEGF receptors, both on endothelial cells and soluble VEGFR1, is likely important to signaling in vivo. Additionally, our model predicts that VEGF isoform-specific properties lead to distinct profiles of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 binding and VEGFR2 site-specific phosphorylation in vivo, mediated by Neuropilin-1. These predicted signaling changes mirror those observed in murine systems expressing single VEGF isoforms. Simulations predict that, contrary to the 'ligand-shifting hypothesis,' VEGF and PlGF do not compete for receptor binding at physiological concentrations, though PlGF is predicted to slightly increase VEGFR2 phosphorylation when over-expressed by 10-fold. These results are critical to design of appropriate therapeutic strategies to control VEGF availability and signaling in regenerative medicine applications.

摘要

血管内皮生长因子A(VEGF)的剪接异构体对细胞外基质(ECM)和共受体神经纤毛蛋白1(NRP1)具有不同的亲和力,这在仅表达单一VEGF异构体的模型系统中会导致不同的血管表型。固定在ECM上的VEGF可直接结合并激活VEGF受体2(VEGFR2),其位点特异性磷酸化模式与可扩散的VEGF不同。迄今为止,ECM结合改变VEGF异构体以及相关胎盘生长因子(PlGF)在体内的分布并产生血管生成信号的方式尚未得到充分理解。在此,我们将先前经过验证的关于VEGFR2连接、细胞内运输和位点特异性磷酸化的细胞水平计算模型扩展到多尺度全身框架,该模型捕捉了可溶性和固定化VEGF信号传导的差异。这个计算系统药理学模型捕捉了ECM对VEGF和PlGF不同的异构体特异性生长因子分布的调节能力,以及缓冲组织中游离VEGF和PlGF水平的能力。我们表明,固定化生长因子与内皮细胞上的VEGF受体以及可溶性VEGFR1的结合可能对体内信号传导很重要。此外,我们的模型预测,VEGF异构体特异性特性会导致体内VEGFR1和VEGFR2结合以及VEGFR2位点特异性磷酸化的不同模式,由神经纤毛蛋白-1介导。这些预测的信号变化与在表达单一VEGF异构体的小鼠系统中观察到的变化一致。模拟预测,与“配体转移假说”相反,在生理浓度下VEGF和PlGF不会竞争受体结合,不过当PlGF过表达10倍时预计会略微增加VEGFR2磷酸化。这些结果对于设计适当的治疗策略以控制再生医学应用中VEGF的可用性和信号传导至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验